edded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> >>> [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> >>> Khem Raj
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 2:49 PM
> >>> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [oe]
...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Khem Raj
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 2:49 PM
>>> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>>> Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] base.bbclass: add support for SOC_FAMILY in
>>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
>>&g
10 2:49 PM
>> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] base.bbclass: add support for SOC_FAMILY in
>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:47 -0500
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:11 -0500, Maupin, Chase wrote:
> From what I've learned it seems that MACHINE_CLASS and SOC_FAMILY are
> different in what they are trying to accomplish.
>
> SOC_FAMILY is defining a family of processors and the features that processor
> has. Whereas MACHINE_CLASS is de
ject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] base.bbclass: add support for SOC_FAMILY in
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:47 -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
> >> * Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
> &
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:47 -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
>> * Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
>> setting for a recipe.
>> * This will allow recipes to work for entire families of
>> devices without having to maint
On 04/08/10 18:21, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 05:59:30PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>> On 04/08/10 17:13, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:48:38PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:17 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>>>
Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2010/8/4 Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-08-10 02:19, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:47:20PM -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
* Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
setting for a recipe.
* This w
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 05:59:30PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On 04/08/10 17:13, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:48:38PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:17 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> >>> FWIW, minimal is using MACHINE_CLASS since qu
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:11:19AM -0500, Maupin, Chase wrote:
>
> > Failing that though, testing COMPATIBLE_MACHINE against MACHINE_CLASS
> > probably is more desirable than adding a completely new variable (i.e.
> > SOC_FAMILY) for that purpose.
>
> From what I've learned it seems that MACHINE_
On 04/08/10 17:13, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:48:38PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:17 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>>> FWIW, minimal is using MACHINE_CLASS since quite a while to
>>> reduce the need for adding the same files over and ov
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:48:38PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:17 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > FWIW, minimal is using MACHINE_CLASS since quite a while to
> > reduce the need for adding the same files over and over again,
> > this is being used e.g. for HTC ms
ject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] base.bbclass: add support for SOC_FAMILY in
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
>
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:17 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > FWIW, minimal is using MACHINE_CLASS since quite a while to
> > reduce the need for adding the same files
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:17 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> FWIW, minimal is using MACHINE_CLASS since quite a while to
> reduce the need for adding the same files over and over again,
> this is being used e.g. for HTC msm7 series and OpenEZX series
> (see conf/machine/include).
>
> Perhaps
FWIW, minimal is using MACHINE_CLASS since quite a while to
reduce the need for adding the same files over and over again,
this is being used e.g. for HTC msm7 series and OpenEZX series
(see conf/machine/include).
Perhaps it's time to standardize something like that.
Cheers,
--
:M:
___
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:47 -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
> * Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
> setting for a recipe.
> * This will allow recipes to work for entire families of
> devices without having to maintain/update the compatible
> devices as new devices are add
2010/8/4 Koen Kooi
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04-08-10 02:19, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:47:20PM -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
> >> * Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
> >> setting for a recipe.
> >> * This will a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-08-10 02:19, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:47:20PM -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
>> * Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
>> setting for a recipe.
>> * This will allow recipes to work for entire fami
On (03/08/10 20:19), Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:47:20PM -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
> > * Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
> > setting for a recipe.
> > * This will allow recipes to work for entire families of
> > devices without having to ma
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:47:20PM -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
> * Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
> setting for a recipe.
> * This will allow recipes to work for entire families of
> devices without having to maintain/update the compatible
> devices as new devices
* Add support for using SOC_FAMILY in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINES
setting for a recipe.
* This will allow recipes to work for entire families of
devices without having to maintain/update the compatible
devices as new devices are added into a family
Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin
---
classes/base.
21 matches
Mail list logo
