Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-15 Thread Chris Larson
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 12/15/2010 05:35 PM, Chris Larson wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Khem Raj wrote: Note that if you use a mirror site with the SVN checkout archive in it, you won't try and do the fetch at all.  This may or may n

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-15 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 12/15/2010 05:35 PM, Chris Larson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> Note that if you use a mirror site with the SVN checkout archive in it, you >>> won't try and do the fetch at all. This may or may not be applicable to >>> your case. For your case I think what we

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-15 Thread Chris Larson
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> Note that if you use a mirror site with the SVN checkout archive in it, you >> won't try and do the fetch at all.  This may or may not be applicable to >> your case.  For your case I think what we really want is a way to globally >> toggle the s

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-15 Thread Enrico Scholz
Ryan D Phillips writes: > I would like to see this patch get into the OE tree to make the tree > more robust to proxies. Currently, this is the only customization I > need for the projects I work on. fwiw, I wrote a local patch for bitbake https://www.cvg.de/people/ensc/0004-svn-tunne

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-14 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On 12/14/2010 09:30 AM, Ryan D Phillips wrote: >> >> On 12/13/2010 2:00 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ryan D Phillips >>> wrote: SVN over HTTP is a more reliable transport for developers behind restri

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-14 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Ryan D Phillips wrote: > On 12/13/2010 2:00 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ryan D Phillips >>  wrote: >>> >>>  SVN over HTTP is a more reliable transport for developers behind >>> restrictive >>> proxies. >>> >> >> and how much slower/f

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-14 Thread Tom Rini
On 12/14/2010 09:30 AM, Ryan D Phillips wrote: On 12/13/2010 2:00 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ryan D Phillips wrote: SVN over HTTP is a more reliable transport for developers behind restrictive proxies. and how much slower/faster is it when compared to svn protocol

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-14 Thread Ryan D Phillips
On 12/13/2010 2:00 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ryan D Phillips wrote: SVN over HTTP is a more reliable transport for developers behind restrictive proxies. and how much slower/faster is it when compared to svn protocol ? The speed depends on which subversion cl

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-13 Thread Aeschbacher, Fabrice
:13 An: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Betreff: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout SVN over HTTP is a more reliable transport for developers behind restrictive proxies. Regards, Ryan ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list

Re: [oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ryan D Phillips wrote: >  SVN over HTTP is a more reliable transport for developers behind > restrictive > proxies. > and how much slower/faster is it when compared to svn protocol ? > Regards, > Ryan > > ___ > Openemb

[oe] [PATCH] eglibc: use HTTP for svn checkout

2010-12-13 Thread Ryan D Phillips
SVN over HTTP is a more reliable transport for developers behind restrictive proxies. Regards, Ryan >From c0a5ad76e64d961735b5c07326d86107ef98f6a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryan D Phillips Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:00:27 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] eglibc: Use HTTP for svn checkout SVN over H