Hi,
Op 21-05-2024 om 21:33 schreef Ferry Toth:
Hi,
Op 14-05-2024 om 19:39 schreef Geoff Parker:
Thanks Khem for the link to openembedded-contrib and information on
how scarthgap updates
are staged. However, I'm not seeing the nodejs-os-cache commit in the
stable/scarthgap-nut
branch which is
Hi,
Op 14-05-2024 om 19:39 schreef Geoff Parker:
Thanks Khem for the link to openembedded-contrib and information on
how scarthgap updates
are staged. However, I'm not seeing the nodejs-os-cache commit in the
stable/scarthgap-nut
branch which is needed to fix nodejs builds on scarthgap also.
Thanks Khem for the link to openembedded-contrib and information on
how scarthgap updates
are staged. However, I'm not seeing the nodejs-os-cache commit in the
stable/scarthgap-nut
branch which is needed to fix nodejs builds on scarthgap also. Are
recent fixes in
meta-openembedded master
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 11:57 PM Geoff Parker via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> When is the expected next update to the scarthgap branch? I've watched the
> patch move from master-next to master, but there does not seem to be a
> visible scarthgap-next branch to watch.
Usually there is
When is the expected next update to the scarthgap branch? I've watched the
patch move from master-next to master, but there does not seem to be a
visible scarthgap-next branch to watch.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110334):
+Armin. as Armin is already preparing first batch of changes for scarthgap.
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:15 AM Martin Hundeb?ll via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> Please pick this patch for scarthgap too.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 11:42 +0200, Martin Hundebøll
Hi Khem,
Please pick this patch for scarthgap too.
Thanks,
Martin
On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 11:42 +0200, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> Apparently, npm has changed its request accept header, so that cache
> lookup misses. This causes an ENOTCACHED error when doing the offline
> install in do_compile()
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:52 AM Martin Jansa via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> Thanks, perfect timing, I've just sent e-mail reply to nodejs upgrade
> that npm-10.5.0 upgrade broke this. Will test your change now. Thanks!
And it works for me, thanks again.
Cheers,
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Thanks, perfect timing, I've just sent e-mail reply to nodejs upgrade
that npm-10.5.0 upgrade broke this. Will test your change now. Thanks!
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:42 AM Martin Hundeb?ll via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> Apparently, npm has changed its request accept header, so that cache
Sorry, forgot the [meta-oe] prefix.
// Martin
On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 11:42 +0200, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> Apparently, npm has changed its request accept header, so that cache
> lookup misses. This causes an ENOTCACHED error when doing the offline
> install in do_compile() from npm.bbclass.
>
>
Apparently, npm has changed its request accept header, so that cache
lookup misses. This causes an ENOTCACHED error when doing the offline
install in do_compile() from npm.bbclass.
Fix it by updating the fake cache entry to match the newest behaviour
from npm.
Note that npm doesn't agree with
11 matches
Mail list logo