See http://code.google.com/p/opkg/source/detail?r=553
And previous discussions:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg01423.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg04051.html
Signed-off-by: Graham Gower
New opkg requires full and correct package name, version, revision and
architecture to be specified when requiring de-installation of a package.
Collect that info from opkg-info.
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org
---
classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 15 +--
1 files
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 15:52 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
New opkg requires full and correct package name, version, revision and
architecture to be specified when requiring de-installation of a package.
Collect that info from opkg-info.
This seems like a bug in opkg. Would it not be better
On 25 February 2010 07:30, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 15:52 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
New opkg requires full and correct package name, version, revision and
architecture to be specified when requiring de-installation of a package.
Collect that info from
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 08:18 +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
This is an unintended side effect of other changes, however I'm not
sure that I consider it inappropriate behaviour. That status does
apply to a particular package version, does it not?
No, the SW_xx flags should apply to any version and
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 09:59:26PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 08:18 +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
This is an unintended side effect of other changes, however I'm not
sure that I consider it inappropriate behaviour. That status does
apply to a particular package version,
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:06 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
The thing is, those SW_xx flags are not preserved anyway - the status file is
primed with BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS (Status: deinstall), but later gets
overwritten by the list of only installed packages. Of course, deinstall
packages are
