Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-12-01 Thread Maupin, Chase
-Original Message- From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Tom Rini Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:29 AM To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-12-01 Thread Chris Larson
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Maupin, Chase chase.mau...@ti.com wrote: I know this was all posted a while back.  Has there been any resolution on this?  I didn't notice any additional responses to this thread. See the TSC meeting notes, it was discussed (with myself excluded from the

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-11-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 12:44 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-10-10 17:41, Chris Larson wrote: From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Given the current

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-11-10 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net wrote: ... This change is pretty serious and potentially alters the handling of any double override. Poky uses them a bit more extensively than OE does. Its effectively an architecture change to OE yet no discussion was had at

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-11-10 Thread Tom Rini
Otavio Salvador wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net wrote: ... This change is pretty serious and potentially alters the handling of any double override. Poky uses them a bit more extensively than OE does. Its effectively an architecture change to OE yet no

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-11-10 Thread Tom Rini
Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 12:44 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-10-10 17:41, Chris Larson wrote: From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Given the

[oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-10-15 Thread Chris Larson
From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Given the current implementation of OVERRIDES in bitbake, the variable is expected to contain elements in the order least specific to most specific, however, our current usage of it does not match that. As one example, local is supposed to always be the

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-10-15 Thread Maupin, Chase
-Original Message- From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Chris Larson Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:41 AM To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-10-15 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Chris Larson kerg...@gmail.com wrote: From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Given the current implementation of OVERRIDES in bitbake, the variable is expected to contain elements in the order least specific to most specific, however, our current usage of

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-10-15 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-10-10 17:41, Chris Larson wrote: From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Given the current implementation of OVERRIDES in bitbake, the variable is expected to contain elements in the order least specific to most specific, however, our

Re: [oe] [PATCH (v2)] Reverse the order of OVERRIDES

2010-10-15 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-10-10 17:41, Chris Larson wrote: From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Given the current implementation of OVERRIDES in bitbake, the variable is