2010/10/8 Frans Meulenbroeks :
> 2010/10/6 Frans Meulenbroeks :
>> Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks
>> ---
>> classes/cpan-base.bbclass | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/classes/cpan-base.bbclass b/classes/cpan-base.bbclass
>> index 379defa..a04f61
2010/10/6 Frans Meulenbroeks :
> Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks
> ---
> classes/cpan-base.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/classes/cpan-base.bbclass b/classes/cpan-base.bbclass
> index 379defa..a04f61c 100644
> --- a/classes/cpan-base.bbcla
Triggered by a remark from Martin on irc:
Do we need a PR bump for all users of those classes?
Did a quick grep, there are 75 recipes inheriting image, about 160
inheriting cpan and about 200 inheriting distutils
rubyextensions.bbclass is not used.
And if it is felt that a bump is needed, is it o
2010/10/7 Philip Balister :
> Next time, can you add the package name to the commit message?
>
>
> Philip
Actually there is no package name here as it is for .bbclass, but I
will add the bbclass filename to the commit message before pushing
this (need one more ack)
That also explains why gmail dec
Next time, can you add the package name to the commit message?
Philip
On 10/06/2010 05:08 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks
---
classes/cpan-base.bbclass |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/cpan-base.bbclass b/class
Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks
---
classes/cpan-base.bbclass |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/cpan-base.bbclass b/classes/cpan-base.bbclass
index 379defa..a04f61c 100644
--- a/classes/cpan-base.bbclass
+++ b/classes/cpan-base.bbclass
@@ -5,7 +5,
