Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
There are so many versions of toolchain components gcc/binutils/glibc that
we have in metadata. I would like to reduce the number and keep supporting
the ones we really use. Right now we have recipes for
binutils = 2.14.90.0.6,2.14.90.0.7, 2.15.94.0.1, 2.16, 2.16.1,
On (01/11/10 12:36), Tom Rini wrote:
Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
There are so many versions of toolchain components gcc/binutils/glibc that
we have in metadata. I would like to reduce the number and keep supporting
the ones we really use. Right now we have recipes for
binutils =
В сообщении от Пятница 29 октября 2010 23:17:18 автор Khem Raj написал:
binutils = 2.14.90.0.6,2.14.90.0.7, 2.15.94.0.1, 2.16, 2.16.1, 2.16.91.0.6,
2.16.91.0.7, 2.17, 2.17.50.1, 2.17.50.0.5, 2.17.50.0.8, 2.17.50.0.12, 2.18,
2.18.50.0.7, 2.18.atmel.1.0.1, 2.19, 2.19.1, 2.19.51, 2.19.51.0.3,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:17:18PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
There are so many versions of toolchain components gcc/binutils/glibc that
we have in metadata. I would like to reduce the number and keep supporting
the ones we really use. Right now we have recipes for
binutils =
2010/10/30 Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:17:18PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
There are so many versions of toolchain components gcc/binutils/glibc that
we have in metadata. I would like to reduce the number and keep supporting
the ones we really use. Right now
