Am Mittwoch, den 28.07.2010, 19:40 -0700 schrieb Chris Larson:
> I'd agree with that, for simple recipes, though I don't necessarily think
> that precludes the maintainership concept. I wouldn't mind just claiming
> ownership of some recipes, and letting people fix things in them, and just
> keepi
2010/7/29 Tom Rini
> Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>
>> 2010/7/27 Chris Larson
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
>>> fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> PS: I think part of the problem is that most recipes do not have a
well-defined owner who is responsible f
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>
>> 2010/7/27 Chris Larson
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
>>> fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> PS: I think part of the problem is that most recipes do not have a
well-defi
Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2010/7/27 Chris Larson
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
PS: I think part of the problem is that most recipes do not have a
well-defined owner who is responsible for maintaining them. I know we use
to
have them
2010/7/27 Chris Larson
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
> fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > PS: I think part of the problem is that most recipes do not have a
> > well-defined owner who is responsible for maintaining them. I know we use
> > to
> > have them mention
