[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] Finer gperftools packaging

2019-07-20 Thread Anatol Belski via Openembedded-devel
This splits gperftools into - gperftools script - gperftools profiler and other libs - libtcmalloc-minimal - docs and other stuff Especially the libctmalloc-minimal is what is useful if only an improved allocator needs to be used. The gperftools package stays otherwise fully backward compatible,

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] Finer gperftools packaging

2019-07-20 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Anatol On 7/20/19 6:33 PM, Anatol Belski via Openembedded-devel wrote: This splits gperftools into - gperftools script - gperftools profiler and other libs - libtcmalloc-minimal - docs and other stuff Especially the libctmalloc-minimal is what is useful if only an improved allocator needs t

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] Finer gperftools packaging

2019-07-21 Thread Anatol Belski
Hi Khem, thanks for the review. On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 19:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Anatol > > On 7/20/19 6:33 PM, Anatol Belski via Openembedded-devel wrote: > > This splits gperftools into > > > > - gperftools script > > - gperftools profiler and other libs > > - libtcmalloc-minimal > >

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] Finer gperftools packaging

2019-07-21 Thread Anatol Belski
On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 19:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > +EXTRA_OECONF_append += " --enable-static" > > + > > why do we need this ? > Overseen this. This is needed, because for some reason static libraries was not produced on ARM64 by default, while they was on AMD64. I'll put a comment for this li

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] Finer gperftools packaging

2019-07-21 Thread Anatol Belski
Hi Khem, On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 19:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > +FILES_${PN}-libs = "${libdir}/libprofiler*${SOLIBS} > > ${libdir}/libprofiler*${SOLIBS}\ > > + ${libdir}/libtcmalloc${SOLIBS} \ > > + ${libdir}/libtcmalloc_debug${SOLIBS} \ > > + ${libdir}/libtcmalloc_a