Hello Roger,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think
this affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5.
This means with oe-core + meta-oe you now can choose between
gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7.
However, both
...@yoctoproject.org;
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [oe] ti81xx-psp-linux-2.6.37: broken kernel with gcc
4.5
Hello Roger,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think
this affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta
On 23.05.2012 11:48, Steffen Sledz wrote:
Hi Roger!
On 18.05.2012 16:55, Thilo Fromm wrote:
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think
this affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5.
This means with oe-core
Hi Roger!
On 18.05.2012 16:55, Thilo Fromm wrote:
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think
this affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5.
This means with oe-core + meta-oe you now can choose between
Hello Eric,
Netra and Centaurus are internal codenames for the SoC families behind those
part numbers Koen mentioned above. Those codenames are not publicly
advertised
and Koen is just showing off after being on the inside... :) :-P
these names were already dislosed on TI's website, for
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:22:15AM +0200, Eric B?nard wrote:
Hi Denys,
Le Fri, 18 May 2012 17:48:33 -0400,
Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org a ?crit :
Netra and Centaurus are internal codenames for the SoC families behind
those
part numbers Koen mentioned above. Those codenames are
Hi Denys,
Le Fri, 18 May 2012 17:48:33 -0400,
Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org a écrit :
Netra and Centaurus are internal codenames for the SoC families behind those
part numbers Koen mentioned above. Those codenames are not publicly
advertised
and Koen is just showing off after being on
Op 18 mei 2012, om 14:53 heeft Thilo Fromm het volgende geschreven:
Hello Koen,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think this
affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5. This means
with oe-core + meta-oe
Hello Koen,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think this
affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5. This means
with oe-core + meta-oe you now can choose between gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7.
However, both compilers
Op 18 mei 2012, om 15:39 heeft Thilo Fromm het volgende geschreven:
Hello Koen,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think this
affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5. This means
with oe-core + meta-oe
Hello Koen,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think this
affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5. This means
with oe-core + meta-oe you now can choose between gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7.
However, both compilers
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 14:52:36, Koen Kooi wrote:
Cc: meta...@yoctoproject.org;
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [oe] ti81xx-psp-linux-2.6.37: broken kernel
with gcc 4.5
Op 18 mei 2012, om 15:39 heeft Thilo Fromm het volgende geschreven:
Hello Koen
Hello Roger,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think
this affects both projects one way or the other.
Recently, meta-openembedded/toolchain-layer removed gcc-4.5.
This means with oe-core + meta-oe you now can choose between
gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7.
However, both
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 15:40:25, Thilo Fromm wrote:
Cc: meta...@yoctoproject.org;
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [oe] ti81xx-psp-linux-2.6.37: broken kernel
with gcc 4.5
Hello Koen,
sorry for the cross-post (openembedded-devel, meta-ti), I think
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0200, Thilo Fromm wrote:
What do you mean by Ne/Ce?
Netra/Centaurus, dm81xx, c6a81xx, am38xx, am39xx or whatever TI is
calling it nowadays.
We're on a TI DaVinci DM8148, featuring a cortex-a8 combined with a
C674x DSP.
So a centaurus family
15 matches
Mail list logo
