On (03/08/10 12:04), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> Wrt the bbappend / amend.inc discussion:
>
> I was wondering how version management would work.
> I can imagine that if I change something in a bbappend file (or amend.inc)
> file, I would like to have something like PR that I could bump.
> In my ca
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 12:04 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> Wrt the bbappend / amend.inc discussion:
>
> I was wondering how version management would work.
> I can imagine that if I change something in a bbappend file (or amend.inc)
> file, I would like to have something like PR that I could bu
Wrt the bbappend / amend.inc discussion:
I was wondering how version management would work.
I can imagine that if I change something in a bbappend file (or amend.inc)
file, I would like to have something like PR that I could bump.
In my case these recipes live in an overlay which is also used by
c
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/7/20 Chris Larson
>
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's also needed, in some cases, to lock down your changes via
> OVERRIDES
> > >>
2010/7/20 Chris Larson
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
>
> > Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> >> It's also needed, in some cases, to lock down your changes via OVERRIDES
> >> that will only match what you want to work on. For example, we're using
> a
> >> snapshot with an older pyt
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
>> It's also needed, in some cases, to lock down your changes via OVERRIDES
>> that will only match what you want to work on. For example, we're using a
>> snapshot with an older python, so amend.inc in our python director
Tom Rini wrote:
It's also needed, in some cases, to lock down your changes via OVERRIDES
that will only match what you want to work on. For example, we're using
a snapshot with an older python, so amend.inc in our python directory
looks like:
SRC_URI_append_pn-python-native =
"file://python
Tom Rini wrote:
Chris Larson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/7/19 Chris Larson
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Chris Larson
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
Richard Purdie wrote:
Whilst o
Chris Larson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/7/19 Chris Larson
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Chris Larson
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
Richard Purdie wrote:
Whilst our layers mechani
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/7/19 Chris Larson
>
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Chris Larson
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > >> Richard Purdie wrote:
> > >>
> > >
2010/7/19 Chris Larson
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>
> >>> Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
> >>> bugged me for a while. If you have
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>> Richard Purdie wrote:
>>
>>> Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
>>> bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
>>> mach
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Richard Purdie wrote:
>
>> Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
>> bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
>> machine specific information in it and you have your new machine code i
Richard Purdie wrote:
Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
machine specific information in it and you have your new machine code in
a layer, how do you add a pointercal file for your machine?
On 17/07/10 02:25, Richard Purdie wrote:
Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
machine specific information in it and you have your new machine code in
a layer, how do you add a pointercal file
2010/7/18 Chris Larson
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
> fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2010/7/16 Richard Purdie
> >
> > > Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
> > > bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/7/16 Richard Purdie
>
> > Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
> > bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
> > machine specific inform
2010/7/16 Richard Purdie
> Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
> bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
> machine specific information in it and you have your new machine code in
> a layer, how do you add a pointercal file for you
I like it too.
So does this mean that PR bumps happen in the bbappend file? Obviously
you need to have the recipe rebuilt if a change is made.
Carl Simonson
simons...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:35 AM, George C. Huntington, III
wrote:
> I love this idea. seeing this would go a long w
I love this idea. seeing this would go a long way towards getting my
employers on board with using openembedded and even getting to contribute.
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-b
Whilst our layers mechanism, is great it does have a drawback which has
bugged me for a while. If you have a recipe like pointercal which has
machine specific information in it and you have your new machine code in
a layer, how do you add a pointercal file for your machine?
Answer is you copy the
21 matches
Mail list logo
