Re: [oe] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

2011-01-04 Thread Chris Larson
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > The split between the code in general in bitbake is in general ever > improving in my opinion. Chris has some some really great work on > bitbake recently, particularly making it more pythonic. Some of the > changes just before the holidays,

Re: [oe] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

2011-01-02 Thread Esben Haabendal
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 19:49 +, Richard Purdie wrote: > The split between the code in general in bitbake is in general ever > improving in my opinion. Chris has some some really great work on > bitbake recently, particularly making it more pythonic. Some of the > changes just before the holiday

Re: [oe] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

2011-01-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 11:26 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > There is a little friction around bitbake at the moment. I think after a > > discussion I had with Chris earlier on some things are clearer and its > > probably good to summarise how

Re: [oe] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

2011-01-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:24 +0100, Esben Haabendal wrote: > While I do not and cannot be considered a maintainer in any form, I do > have a special use for BitBake. I use an (almost) upstream BitBake as > part of the OE-lite project, and as such has rather strong investment in > BitBake. > > I do

Re: [oe] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

2010-12-31 Thread Esben Haabendal
Hi On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 02:42 +, Richard Purdie wrote: > There are a bunch of people who can commit to bitbake, some inactive, > some active in different areas with different priorities. I think mine > are clear above, I'd appreciate others to make their objectives clear so > everyone unders

Re: [oe] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

2010-12-31 Thread Andrea Adami
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > There is a little friction around bitbake at the moment. I think after a > discussion I had with Chris earlier on some things are clearer and its > probably good to summarise how things stand. ... If I'm not wrong, Chris just finished the P

[oe] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

2010-12-30 Thread Richard Purdie
There is a little friction around bitbake at the moment. I think after a discussion I had with Chris earlier on some things are clearer and its probably good to summarise how things stand. I should make it clear I've not abandoned bitbake. Anyone who has attended any OEDEM or other Yocto/Poky disc