I agree with SOB. Also correct patch is attached.
On 05/13/2015 03:39 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:42:40PM +0300, Andrey Rusalin wrote:
Missing SOB line and patchwork doesn't pick forwarded inline patches
correctly.
I've fixed both when cherry-picking to master-next, bu
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:42:40PM +0300, Andrey Rusalin wrote:
>
>
Missing SOB line and patchwork doesn't pick forwarded inline patches
correctly.
I've fixed both when cherry-picking to master-next, but please reply that you
agree with your SOB.
>
> Forwarded Message
> Sub
Forwarded Message
Subject:[meta-qt5][PATCH]
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:44:59 +0300
From: arusalin
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
--
Best Regards,
Andrey Rusalin.
>From 7040c6382af3d99f53b3f9fa45336cb911438923 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Yes, that's for master-next.
---
Petr
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 05:27:15PM +0400, Petr Nechaev wrote:
> > Updated comments to avoid confusion
>
> This was meant only for master-next, right?
>
> I've squashed it there to the update. Thanks
>
>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 05:27:15PM +0400, Petr Nechaev wrote:
> Updated comments to avoid confusion
This was meant only for master-next, right?
I've squashed it there to the update. Thanks
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:
> Date: Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:38 PM
> Subject: [meta-qt5
Updated comments to avoid confusion
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:38 PM
Subject: [meta-qt5][PATCH] Updated comments in qt5-versions.inc
To: petr.nech...@cogentembedded.com
Only members may post to the list. Please subscribe and post again.
