http://www.google.com/search?q=openembedded+bitbake
http://www.google.com/search?q=bitbake+getting+started
Notice that the only useful information for a dev on there is the gumstix
link, which is apparently not up to par with the oe standards.
http://www.gumstix.net/Setup-and-Programming/view/Buil
2010/8/22 AJ ONeal :
> http://www.google.com/search?q=openembedded+bitbake
> http://www.google.com/search?q=bitbake+getting+started
>
> Notice that the only useful information for a dev on there is the gumstix
> link, which is apparently not up to par with the oe standards.
> http://www.gumstix.net
I think AJ meant there needs to be another more in depth one. I would
agree with that myself. That one barely touches anything about OE to
me its to simple of an example.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks
wrote:
> 2010/8/22 AJ ONeal :
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=openembe
How about a series of workflow-oriented tutorials.
* Hello Make with bitbake
* Hello Autotools with bitbake
* Hello WAF with bitbake
* Hello scons with bitbake
Something like that where you package a file that includes a shared
executable binary, a static binary, a shared and static library, head
