On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
>> It's worth noting here that TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" is a hack,
>> not an ideal solution.
>
> right.
>
> The preferred way of solving this is
>> reviewing the buildsystem in question
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
> It's worth noting here that TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" is a hack,
> not an ideal solution.
right.
The preferred way of solving this is
> reviewing the buildsystem in question to determine how best to make it
> obey all of our bitbake va
It's worth noting here that TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" is a hack,
not an ideal solution. The preferred way of solving this is
reviewing the buildsystem in question to determine how best to make it
obey all of our bitbake variables, rather than injecting one into
another that it happens to alr
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jay Snyder
wrote:
>>
>>
>> try the following:
>> TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
>> This should resolve your problems if you build your executable from
>> within your OE buildsystem.
>> In very rare cases (e.g. when you build some programs outside of OE
>> but use O
try the following:
TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
This should resolve your problems if you build your executable from
within your OE buildsystem.
In very rare cases (e.g. when you build some programs outside of OE
but use OE to package all) it could be useful to use the following:
INSANE_SKIP_ob
