Hi,
as evidenced by http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/407335/ the
current default gtkmm (2.18.1) does not compile with the current default
gtk+ (2.14.2). My suggestion is to remove DEFAULT_PREFERENCE -1 from
the 2.18.3 recipe and make it the new OE default.
Objections?
Regards
Rolf
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:03 +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> as evidenced by http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/407335/ the
> current default gtkmm (2.18.1) does not compile with the current default
> gtk+ (2.14.2). My suggestion is to remove DEFAULT_PREFERENCE -1 from
> the 2.18.3 recipe and
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>
> All too often we end up with new versions being stuck in at
> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE -1 simply because the person updating the recipe
> didn't want to take the responsibility for testing it. This is
>
What should that responsibility inv
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:48 +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> What should that responsibility involve?
>
> I usually "test" on one or two machines but still set a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE
> "-1".
>
> It's very hard for the committer to collect enough testing evidence
> for all the use cases / variables
Hello,
thanks for the valuable insights.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>
> untested or untrusted. I would also propose that, in future, any
> setting of DEFAULT_PREFERENCE in a recipe must be accompanied by a
> comment explaining why it was set, and (if it is set negative
Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2010, 20:26 + schrieb Phil Blundell:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:48 +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> > What should that responsibility involve?
> >
> > I usually "test" on one or two machines but still set a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE
> > "-1".
> >
> > It's very hard for the
Phil Blundell wrote:
> Automatically adding new versions with a negative DEFAULT_PREFERENCE
> doesn't scale: if everybody did this then, eventually, we would end
> up with virtually the whole tree being D_P -1. And it sends a
> confusing message to other users, since people tend to assume that a
Dnia piątek, 8 stycznia 2010 o 10:36:01 Martyn Welch napisał(a):
> I've recently had a small problem related to this. All of the kernel
> packages seem to have DEFAULT_PREFERENCE=-1, for popular targets this
> isn't a problem, but for less popular ones it was picking the latest
> kernel at D_P=-1.
