[oe] Reproducible builds (Was Re: Checksums in Bitbake)

2010-03-27 Thread GNUtoo
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:45 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > I've seen too often (also outside OE) that two engineers take the same > source yet still get different results, and that bugs at a customer > site cannot be reproduced in the lab (and yes, I do know there are > other ways to tackle thi

Re: [oe] Reproducible builds (Was Re: Checksums in Bitbake)

2010-03-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 19:31 +0100, GNUtoo wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:45 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > I've seen too often (also outside OE) that two engineers take the same > > source yet still get different results, and that bugs at a customer > > site cannot be reproduced in the lab

Re: [oe] Reproducible builds (Was Re: Checksums in Bitbake)

2010-03-27 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27-03-10 19:54, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 19:31 +0100, GNUtoo wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:45 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>> I've seen too often (also outside OE) that two engineers take the same >>> source yet still get di

Re: [oe] Reproducible builds (Was Re: Checksums in Bitbake)

2010-03-29 Thread Sander van Grieken
On Saturday 27 March 2010 19:31:49 GNUtoo wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:45 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > I've seen too often (also outside OE) that two engineers take the same > > source yet still get different results, and that bugs at a customer > > site cannot be reproduced in the lab