On Tuesday 16 November 2010 07:38:07 Graham Gower wrote:
On 16 November 2010 16:43, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:05:29AM +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
PS: emacs and emacs-x11 fail for me in do_compile.
Do you have make-3.82 on your host?
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 07:38:07 Graham Gower wrote:
On 16 November 2010 16:43, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:05:29AM +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
PS: emacs and emacs-x11 fail for me in do_compile.
Do you have make-3.82 on your host?
emacs.inc has this nugget in do_compile_prepend():
cp -pPR ${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}/* $treedir
During a world build, both emacs and emacs-x11 copy some 5GB into
their work dirs. This really seems like overkill.
Could someone familiar with building emacs take a look to see if
there is a reasonable
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:05:29AM +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
emacs.inc has this nugget in do_compile_prepend():
cp -pPR ${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}/* $treedir
ah, ugly indeed :/
During a world build, both emacs and emacs-x11 copy some 5GB into
their work dirs. This really seems like overkill.
On 16 November 2010 16:43, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:05:29AM +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
PS: emacs and emacs-x11 fail for me in do_compile.
Do you have make-3.82 on your host? emacs-x11_23.1.bb compiles fine with
SHR.
Nope. make --version says 3.81.
