On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 17:15 -0400, Kyle Russell wrote:
> It looks like the only javac that meta-java exposes through its bbclasses
> comes from libecj-bootstrap-native 3.6.2. A few years ago, it looked like
> there was an attempt to allow openjdk-8-native to provide
> virtual/javac-native, but it
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your reply.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:09 AM Richard Leitner
wrote:
> > A few years ago, it looked like
> > there was an attempt to allow openjdk-8-native to provide
> > virtual/javac-native, but it has since been reverted.
>
> As I'm not into the meta-java stuff that
Hi Kyle,
On 10/24/18 11:15 PM, Kyle Russell wrote:
It looks like the only javac that meta-java exposes through its bbclasses
comes from libecj-bootstrap-native 3.6.2.
That's definitely true.
A few years ago, it looked like
there was an attempt to allow openjdk-8-native to provide
It looks like the only javac that meta-java exposes through its bbclasses
comes from libecj-bootstrap-native 3.6.2. A few years ago, it looked like
there was an attempt to allow openjdk-8-native to provide
virtual/javac-native, but it has since been reverted.
I think I understand libecj is
