Re: [oe] openssl-native-1.0.0d-r14.0 compile fails

2011-06-22 Thread A. Schallenberg
Hello, thank you, Henning, for pointing me to the correct directory. Its contents are: openssl-1.0.0d> ls ACKNOWLEDGMENTS apps bugs certs CHANGES CHANGES.SSLeay config Configure crypto demos doc engines e_os2.h e_os.h FAQ include INSTALL install.com INSTALL.DJGPP INSTALL.MacOS INSTALL.NW INSTALL.

Re: [oe] openssl-native-1.0.0d-r14.0 compile fails

2011-06-21 Thread Henning Heinold
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:19:22PM +0200, A. Schallenberg wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011, um 14:49:20 schrieb Phil Blundell: > > ... > > It isn't likely that your choice of toolchain is causing this problem, > > since the package in question is a -native one. From the error you > > p

Re: [oe] openssl-native-1.0.0d-r14.0 compile fails

2011-06-21 Thread A. Schallenberg
Hi, Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011, um 14:49:20 schrieb Phil Blundell: > ... > It isn't likely that your choice of toolchain is causing this problem, > since the package in question is a -native one. From the error you > pasted it looks as though the recipe has simply failed to unpack any > source co

Re: [oe] openssl-native-1.0.0d-r14.0 compile fails

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:32 +0200, A. Schallenberg wrote: > I tried to compile Angstrom (which is based on openembedded). > Unfortunately it fails with a message that is very similar to the > one Robert Schuster reported on 07 Mar 2011. > (Since I wasn't subscribed to this list back then I cannot

Re: [oe] openssl-native-1.0.0d-r14.0 compile fails

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-06-11 14:32, A. Schallenberg wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to compile Angstrom (which is based on openembedded). > gcc version 4.5.2 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2011.03-42) That's not angstrom, that's a harry potter toolchain, don't file bug reports wh

[oe] openssl-native-1.0.0d-r14.0 compile fails

2011-06-21 Thread A. Schallenberg
Hello, I tried to compile Angstrom (which is based on openembedded). Unfortunately it fails with a message that is very similar to the one Robert Schuster reported on 07 Mar 2011. (Since I wasn't subscribed to this list back then I cannot reply to his mail now.) Here is what I get: Log data fol