Hi,
I am trying to use packaged staging, following the description found here:
http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/
http://blog.denix.org/2008/09/getting-dangerous-with-packaged-staging.html
I set:
DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE = "${OEBASE}/pstage"
, and then:
$
e
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. November 2010 12:32
> An: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> Betreff: [oe] packaged-staging
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use packaged staging, following the
> description found here:
> http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packag
Aeschbacher, Fabrice wrote:
I forgot to say we are using bitbake 1.8.12 and branch stable/2009
packaged-staging isn't complete there, sorry.
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openemb
> Aeschbacher, Fabrice wrote:
> > I forgot to say we are using bitbake 1.8.12 and branch stable/2009
>
> packaged-staging isn't complete there, sorry.
>
> Tom Rini
Is it with bitbake-1.8.18 and stable/2009 ?
Fabrice Aeschbacher
___
Openembedded-devel
Aeschbacher, Fabrice wrote:
Aeschbacher, Fabrice wrote:
I forgot to say we are using bitbake 1.8.12 and branch stable/2009
packaged-staging isn't complete there, sorry.
Tom Rini
Is it with bitbake-1.8.18 and stable/2009 ?
Sorry, bitbake 1.10.x and master (aka dev) are required for packaged
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Aeschbacher, Fabrice wrote:
>
>> Aeschbacher, Fabrice wrote:
>>>
I forgot to say we are using bitbake 1.8.12 and branch stable/2009
>>> packaged-staging isn't complete there, sorry.
>>>
>>> Tom Rini
>>>
>>
>> Is it with bitbake-1.8.18 an
Tom and Chris,
Thanks for your replies, things are more clear now.
With kind regards,
Fabrice
> I *think* bitbake 1.8 should be fine with packaged staging,
> its the more
> recent OE that's critical :) Fabrice, you may want to look
> at the Testing
> page on the OE wiki and the testing bra
I seem to have found an issue with packaged staging.
I'll try to describe the problem, but maybe my understanding is not
100% so bear with me in that case
What happens is that I wanted to rebuild console-image from packaged staging.
This failed with the following errors:
Collected errors:
* opk
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:18 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> I seem to have found an issue with packaged staging.
> I'll try to describe the problem, but maybe my understanding is not
> 100% so bear with me in that case
[...]
> I've focused myself on this one:
>
> * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot ins
2010/2/2 Richard Purdie :
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:18 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> I seem to have found an issue with packaged staging.
>> I'll try to describe the problem, but maybe my understanding is not
>> 100% so bear with me in that case
> [...]
>> I've focused myself on this one:
>>
Found it; fixed it; tested it; pushed it;
Root case was that packaged-staging.bbclass was not updated when
DISTRO_PR was introduced.
This caused the generation of pathnames which were missing the
DISTRO_PR part. Fixed it by adding + "${DISTRO_PR}" to the places
involved.
Kudos to RP for pointing
I decided to give packaged staging a try.
(more or less) following the instructions on
http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/
distribution angstrom (dev head)
machine: beagleboard.
I set the DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE to outside tmp. (packaged-staging is
already in
> I set the DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE to outside tmp. (packaged-staging is
> already inherited by default in Angstrom).
Then you incurr in that infamous issue:
http://blog.denix.org/2008/09/getting-even-more-dangerous-with-pstage.html
> Not really an idea how to fix this. Any expert with an opinion?
See
2010/1/23 Andrea Adami :
>> I set the DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE to outside tmp. (packaged-staging is
>> already inherited by default in Angstrom).
> Then you incurr in that infamous issue:
> http://blog.denix.org/2008/09/getting-even-more-dangerous-with-pstage.html
This seems like a good patch to me.
Any
2010/1/26 Frans Meulenbroeks :
> 2010/1/23 Andrea Adami :
>>> I set the DEPLOY_DIR_PSTAGE to outside tmp. (packaged-staging is
>>> already inherited by default in Angstrom).
>> Then you incurr in that infamous issue:
>> http://blog.denix.org/2008/09/getting-even-more-dangerous-with-pstage.html
>
>
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 11:22 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> Andrea, I saw your message on irc saying that last night you hit the same
> issue.
>
> The odd thing is that I have not seen the issue any more.
>
> I have a hunch that it is time-stamp-related. That is also why I post
> here so oth
16 matches
Mail list logo
