9-5 GMT weds-fri is normally ok with me, outisde these times I work a
totally non related job.
G
On 24/01/2011 16:46, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote:
ping?
Am 21.01.2011 um 16:12 schrieb Dr. Michael Lauer:
Philip,
unfortunately you're not commenting on Frans' actual point,
which no longer has any
ping?
Am 21.01.2011 um 16:12 schrieb Dr. Michael Lauer:
> Philip,
>
> unfortunately you're not commenting on Frans' actual point,
> which no longer has anything to do with the u-boot thing.
>
> Board, when can we schedule a meeting?
>
> :M:
>
___
2011/1/22 Graeme Gregory :
> On 22/01/2011 12:36, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> In my opinion it is more useful than a binary generator generating
>> untested (and probably unreproducible) images, but that is just my
>> opinion. If someone wants to play the digital equivalent of russian
>> roulette,
On 22/01/2011 12:36, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> In my opinion it is more useful than a binary generator generating
> untested (and probably unreproducible) images, but that is just my
> opinion. If someone wants to play the digital equivalent of russian
> roulette, who am I to deny it to them.
Wh
2011/1/22 Frans Meulenbroeks :
> 2011/1/22 Koen Kooi :
>
>> using things like insane.bbclass. As expected, you had to use pretty
>
> get your facts straight. minimal uses insane.bbclass:
> minimal.conf:INHERIT += "insane"
> No idea when exactly it was added. I'm not the minimal maintainer),
> but
2011/1/22 Koen Kooi :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22-01-11 01:21, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 20-01-11 19:12, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
>
> In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
[taken the board off cc as this has nothing to do with my original
request to the board]
2011/1/22 Khem Raj :
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
>> I think these remarks come from discussion over the pandaboard u-boot
>> situation? If so, let's consider these options:
>>
>>
2011/1/21 Víctor M. Jáquez L. :
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:40:19PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> 2011/1/20 Víctor M. Jáquez L. :
>> >
>> > In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
>> > glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is the real provider of virtual-libc-dev (the
>> > toolchain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-01-11 01:21, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 20-01-11 19:12, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is t
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
> I think these remarks come from discussion over the pandaboard u-boot
> situation? If so, let's consider these options:
>
> 1) Remove the pandaboard machine from OE since it does not build for some
> people.
>
well its a step backwards
>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 20-01-11 19:12, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
>>
>> In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
>> glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is the real provider of virtual-libc-dev (
Philip,
unfortunately you're not commenting on Frans' actual point,
which no longer has anything to do with the u-boot thing.
Board, when can we schedule a meeting?
:M:
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
htt
On 01/21/2011 03:29 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Dear board,
Can you please take action to developers badmouthing distro's and the
work of others.
This is now (at least) the 2nd time in 3 weeks (and actually Koen has
already quite a track record bashing others).
Frans, I'm not going to google
I fully agree and support this. It has become unbearable again.
To the risk of repeating myself, I feel this attitude is damaging
the reputation of the OpenEmbedded community and thus its
attractivity for contributors, both present and future ones.
Board, which options do we have?
:M:
_
Dear board,
Can you please take action to developers badmouthing distro's and the
work of others.
This is now (at least) the 2nd time in 3 weeks (and actually Koen has
already quite a track record bashing others).
Thank you very much.
Frans
2011/1/21 Koen Kooi :
> Switching to minimal will only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-01-11 19:12, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
>
> In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
> glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is the real provider of virtual-libc-dev (the
> toolchain does not truly provide it -but that is anoth
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:40:19PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> 2011/1/20 Víctor M. Jáquez L. :
> >
> > In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
> > glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is the real provider of virtual-libc-dev (the
> > toolchain does not truly provide it -but that is
2011/1/20 Víctor M. Jáquez L. :
>
> In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
> glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is the real provider of virtual-libc-dev (the
> toolchain does not truly provide it -but that is another bug [1]-).
>
> But the glibc_2.9-r37.4 configuration fails
In order to build native-sdk-image recipe, I found my self compiling
glibc_2.9-r37.4, because it is the real provider of virtual-libc-dev (the
toolchain does not truly provide it -but that is another bug [1]-).
But the glibc_2.9-r37.4 configuration fails using the canonical
arm-angstrom-linux-gnu
19 matches
Mail list logo
