Re: [oe] should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?

2010-08-03 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:15:35AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote: On 08/01/2010 06:39 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On (26/07/10 07:46), Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu

Re: [oe] should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?

2010-08-02 Thread Philip Balister
On 08/01/2010 06:39 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On (26/07/10 07:46), Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit, 9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others). And I see

Re: [oe] should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?

2010-08-01 Thread Khem Raj
On (26/07/10 07:46), Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit, 9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others). And I see no logs attached to your

[oe] should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?

2010-07-26 Thread Robert P. J. Day
been trying to keep up with the recent reorg so a quick question -- i was just about to clean and try a rebuild of b-d-i on my 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 system. should that work? i ask this since, a few days ago, during a test build, i was surprised to note that, finally, abiword built but