Re: [oe] vdr: questions regarding cplusplus.patch

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2010, 21:47 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2010, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Henning Heinold: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 08:53:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > packaging VDR for OE you added cplusplus.patch [1] to be applied. I am > > > trying to get the patch

Re: [oe] vdr: questions regarding cplusplus.patch

2010-01-10 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2010, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Henning Heinold: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 08:53:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > packaging VDR for OE you added cplusplus.patch [1] to be applied. I am > > trying to get the patches upstream, but I have some questions. > > > > Is it correct, that

Re: [oe] vdr: questions regarding cplusplus.patch

2010-01-10 Thread Henning Heinold
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 08:53:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Henning and list, > > > packaging VDR for OE you added cplusplus.patch [1] to be applied. I am > trying to get the patches upstream, but I have some questions. > > Is it correct, that the two changes have the following goals? >

Re: [oe] vdr: questions regarding cplusplus.patch

2010-01-10 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Paul Menzel wrote: > packaging VDR for OE you added cplusplus.patch [1] to be applied. I am > trying to get the patches upstream, but I have some questions. great, thank you. Please document the status as per http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Push_patches_upstream _