On 04/16/2014 12:49 PM, Petar Najman wrote:
Hi Adam,
We've experienced the same issue and came to conclusion that connector does
not work well with multiple databases.
Once we removed other databases everything started working just fine.
I hope this helps.
Anyhow, can someone please
account_constaints will not help on this.
Although I wanted to do so as well in first place, forcing a partner on any
recevable/payable account is not necessary in several cases. ie : taxes
due, social contribution to pay, net wages (if do not want to specifiy
names).
I can also add that some of
+1 for account_partner_required on the same principle as
account_analytic_required.
Since I had something like that in mind since some time. I'll do a merge
proposal.
-sbi
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Frédéric Clementi
frederic.cleme...@camptocamp.com wrote:
account_constaints will not
Thanks Stephane.
I suggest a simple boolean option allowing to force partner on payable or
recevable account only.
I mean I think we should not allow users to select the 3 options (always,
optional or never) like in account_analytic_required...otherwise, we might
have problems on auto-generated
Greetings,
The idea is to ship stuff with Fedex. I was hoping there would be a
shipping module of some sort.
I tried shipping_bista module in both openerp 7 8. i couldn't get it
to work.
I keep getting something like: res.partner.address deprecated -
Dear all,
the version 1.8.3 of the buildout recipe is to be released soon, I hope
to do it tomorrow.
There are mostly usability improvements (user feedback and such), the
big changes are happening in the 1.9 series, as planned.
I've created the 1.8.4 milestone and launchpad and started
Hi Mike Nivato, I don't think the fix is released on ocb-server. The
proposal is still under review.
** Changed in: ocb-server/7.0
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP
Community Backports Team, which is subscribed
Nicolas Bessi - Camptocamp has proposed merging
lp:~camptocamp/ocb-addons/fix-1308364-nbi into lp:ocb-addons.
Requested reviews:
OpenERP Community Backports Team (ocb)
Related bugs:
Bug #1308364 in OpenERP Addons: [7.0] [trunk] report_webkit precise mode
does not take in account set_context
Vincent Renaville@camptocamp has proposed merging
lp:~camptocamp/purchase-report/purchase_print_button into lp:purchase-report.
Requested reviews:
Purchase Core Editors (purchase-core-editors)
For more details, see:
Review: Approve code review, no test
LGTM
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/ocb-addons/fix-1308364-nbi/+merge/216023
Your team OpenERP Community Backports Team is subscribed to branch
lp:ocb-addons.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer
Post to :
** Also affects: ocb-addons
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ocb-addons/7.0
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ocb-addons/7.0
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Changed in: openobject-addons
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Changed
Review: Approve code review, no test
LGTM,
Romain
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/ocb-addons/fix-1308364-nbi/+merge/216023
Your team OpenERP Community Backports Team is subscribed to branch
lp:ocb-addons.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer
Post to
The proposal to merge lp:~camptocamp/purchase-report/purchase_print_button into
lp:purchase-report has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Work in progress
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/purchase-report/purchase_print_button/+merge/216024
--
Review: Approve code review
LGTM
Regards.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/ocb-addons/fix-1308364-nbi/+merge/216023
Your team OpenERP Community Backports Team is subscribed to branch
lp:ocb-addons.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer
Post to :
Tests should be ready
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~agilebg/account-invoice-report/7.0-bug-1284049-hurrinico/+merge/208753
Your team OpenERP Community Reviewer/Maintainer is subscribed to branch
lp:account-invoice-report.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer
Post
Hello,
Thank for the fixes.
The UPDATE NO WAIT will lock the selected rows at postgres database level.
It will avoid a process using the base_location data to alter flushed entries.
It will also avoiding having many concurrent instance of the wizard running on
the same rows.
In this case I
The proposal to merge
lp:~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/7.0-picking_dispatch_picking_oriented_use-rde
into lp:stock-logistic-flows has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Work in progress
For more details, see:
The proposal to merge
lp:~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/7.0-picking_dispatch_wave-according-defined-number-of-sales_rde
into lp:stock-logistic-flows has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Work in progress
For more details, see:
Romain Deheele - Camptocamp has proposed merging
lp:~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/7.0-picking_dispatch_picking_oriented_use-rde
into lp:stock-logistic-flows.
Requested reviews:
Leonardo Pistone - camptocamp (lpistone): code review
Stock and Logistic Core Editors
Hi Leonardo,
I added some tests.
Romain
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/7.0-picking_dispatch_picking_oriented_use-rde/+merge/215147
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is requested to review the proposed
merge of
Hi,
Tests are added.
SQL is removed and replaced by ORM searchs.
Description has been updated.
Romain
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/stock-logistic-flows/7.0-picking_dispatch_wave-according-defined-number-of-sales_rde/+merge/214568
Your team Stock and Logistic Core Editors is
Fix released in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openerp/openobject-
server/7.0/revision/5282
** Changed in: ocb-server/7.0
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
** Changed in: openobject-server
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Fix landed in 7.0 at revision 9988 revid
t...@openerp.com-20140416130356-i3a5pqcib8smdx47.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP
Community Backports Team, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256392
Title:
my task form - for leads -
Guewen Baconnier @ Camptocamp has proposed merging
lp:~camptocamp/margin-analysis/7.0-product_get_cost_field-standard_price-1308584
into lp:margin-analysis.
Requested reviews:
Margin Analysis Core Editors (margin-analysis-core-editors)
Related bugs:
Bug #1308584 in Financial controlling and
Review: Approve code review
LGTM.
I avoid always I can to make a replace operation, making invisible the field
instead.
Regards.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~camptocamp/margin-analysis/7.0-product_get_cost_field-standard_price-1308584/+merge/216124
Your team Margin Analysis Core Editors is
Stéphane Bidoul (Acsone) has proposed merging
lp:~acsone-openerp/web-addons/web_easy_switch_company-userform-fix-sbi into
lp:web-addons.
Requested reviews:
Web-Addons Core Editors (webaddons-core-editors)
For more details, see:
Review: Approve code review
Thanks for the fix!
Regards.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~acsone-openerp/web-addons/web_easy_switch_company-userform-fix-sbi/+merge/216170
Your team Web-Addons Core Editors is subscribed to branch lp:web-addons.
--
Mailing list:
Review: Abstain
@Holger, took your comments into consideration
Taking myself out of the Reviewer list since I have contributed.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~savoirfairelinux-openerp/knowledge-addons/document_multiple_records/+merge/206960
Your team OpenERP Community Reviewer/Maintainer is
You have been requested to review the proposed merge of
lp:~savoirfairelinux-openerp/knowledge-addons/document_multiple_records into
lp:knowledge-addons/7.0.
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~savoirfairelinux-openerp/knowledge-addons/document_multiple_records/+merge/206960
FYI: The module doesn't work for regular users and Sylvain is looking into it.
Everyone - can you remember when testing modules (that you write, and that you
test for suitability for merge proposals) that you test with non ADMIN users?
This didn't happen for this module. My boss isn't happy I
30 matches
Mail list logo