On 07/03/2014 04:10 PM, Martin Collins wrote:
> On 2014-07-03 07:26, Mariano Ruiz wrote:
>> Sorry Martin but I disagree with you, the top-posting is the most
>> practical way, makes more easy follow large threads, but it just my opinion.
>
> Most people read from top to bottom. Forcing people to
I am out of the office from Thu 03/07/2014 until Mon 21/07/2014.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "[Openerp-community]
[Merge] lp:~openerp-community/ocb-server/trunk-bugfix-1053511 into
lp:ocb-server/6.1" sent on 04/07/2014 8.3
+1 avoid signatures with images and large slogans
People having this should create a free gmail address (I'm sure they
already have one).
Peter
2014-07-04 9:30 GMT+02:00 Wouter Tebbens :
>
> On 07/03/2014 04:10 PM, Martin Collins wrote:
>> On 2014-07-03 07:26, Mariano Ruiz wrote:
>>> Sorry Mart
+1 for top posting.
Top is new. Bottom is old.
Bottom-posting may be nice when the thread is short and massages also
short. But having a N-messages thread (let's say 74), with long texts,
becomes a real annoyance to skip (N-1) messages I have already read in
previous mails. My mouse wheel suffers
>
> Bottom-posting may be nice when the thread is short and massages also
> short. But having a N-messages thread (let's say 74), with long texts,
> becomes a real annoyance to skip (N-1) messages I have already read in
> previous mails. My mouse wheel suffers everytime.
>
What you are describing
Discussion about top and bottom won't probably ever have any effect or
improove the situation. Nor probably would it about logo/signature.
Discussion about better tools, however, would indeed.
I really don't understand why we don't explore the available tools out
there in order to find something b
On 2014-07-04 06:26, Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli wrote:
>
> What you are describing is not correct bottom posting. You should only
> keep the relevant part of the previous message you're replying to, not
> everything. Like this.
Right, except you should keep the 'wrote' line, particularly if you
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Martin Collins wrote:
> On 2014-07-03 07:03, Mariano Ruiz wrote:
> > +1 avoid signatures with images and large slogans
>
> And top-posting :-)
> Sadly, for many people, the logos and disclaimers are added by corporate
> dictat at the MTA so cannot be avoided.
> Tho
On 2014-07-04 07:03, David Arnold - El Alemán wrote:
>
> I really don't understand why we don't explore the available tools out
> there in order to find something better and start a discussion about that.
What do the smart kids use?
AFAIK LKML and IRC.
Mailing list comes to me. I don't like havin
2014-07-04 16:53 GMT+02:00 Martin Collins :
> Reuven Lerner was raving about http://www.discourse.org/ in LJ a couple
> of months ago. It's from the StackExchange guys. Sounds like it might
> not be intolerable, but the TryIt is not working for me at all. I get
> that a lot with javascript heavy we
Hi Fabien,
Hi Antony,
Don't want become a party pooper, but will v8.0 still be released on 7
july 2014 as said on the OpenDays ?
Have a nice weekend you all ...
Peter
2014-06-30 18:41 GMT+02:00 Fabien Pinckaers :
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to thank everyone who participated to the Odoo Open Days a
On 2014-07-04 08:59, Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli wrote:
>
> It works for me, and it seems nice. Markdown support, images (with
> optional drag & drop), and not too much distractions.
It seems to need webkit based browsers. More work needed there.
Martin
__
2014-07-04 18:09 GMT+02:00 Martin Collins :
> It seems to need webkit based browsers. More work needed there.
Not really, I tried it in Firefox (30)
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchp
On 2014-07-04 10:21, Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli wrote:
>
> Not really, I tried it in Firefox (30)
Interesting, so did I. Privoxy is blocking some key component. I'll have
to look into that.
Martin
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-commu
Hello community!
We'd like to merge all modules that we developed inside same project to one
module. So we should have 1 module = 1 project. Now it's about 25 modules
and we'd like to move code from all them to one folder, one module.
But I don't understand how to do it? When I uninstall old modu
Hello Raphael,
Thank you for your warning, maybe you're right. But I can explain why we
decided to merge modules. Before we preferred to make 1 change = 1 module.
And now we have many modules that inherit same parts of code in original
modules. Also as all these modules aren't depend on each other
Hello Denis,
before all, I strongly recommend against merging several modules into a
single module!
Why do I think this is extremely bad:
By merging modules you'll destroy the information about the
responsibilities of each part of the customization.
That is you will create a nightmare for future
> What is your recommendation?
>
To avoid to merge :-)
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launch
+1Raphael and Lorenzo but...
If modules are too small changing so little concept and you are inheriting
several times as you said, then merging them wouldn't be a bad idea.
So i recomend before doing anything you think about functional blocks
covering specific funtionality. Each one of this blocks
hello Denis,
generally speaking it's hard to believe merging is the solution.
Random things you can do in your case:
Sometimes you can declare a fake dependency like A < B even if it's not
true, but just to fix the load order. This is a hack, but probably better
than going for spaghetti code at
@Denis
Regarding the migration process the best is
0: comment code that drop the data
1: get a copy of prod database
2: uninstall the big module
3: do some sql request
4: install the new modules
5: do some sql request
6: until it's not perfect go back to step 1
You can take a look to this path fo
21 matches
Mail list logo
