Luc De Meyer (Noviat) has proposed merging
lp:~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix
into lp:account-financial-report.
Requested reviews:
Account Report Core Editors (account-report-core-editor)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad
The proposal to merge
lp:~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix
into lp:account-financial-report has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Work in progress
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-financial-r
hello,
Any news on this one
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix/+merge/193717
Your team Account Report Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:account-financial-report.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net
I am just back from a week of holiday.
I have reserved a bit of time in my agenda to make the MP by the end of this
week.
Luc
www.noviat.com
Rusatiralaan 1, 1083 Brussel
+32 2 808 86 38
-Original Message-
From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Nicolas
MP: cf.
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix2/+merge/216380
www.noviat.com
Rusatiralaan 1, 1083 Brussel
+32 2 808 86 38
-Original Message-
From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Be
Thanks I will have a look on
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix2/+merge/216380
ASAP
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix/+merge
Review: Needs Fixing
Hi,
Thanks for the proposal.
While I understand the logic you want to change I don't understand what problem
you want to fix (I could maybe guess but I'm not sure).
The code you propose was the same and we had to replace it by the more
convoluted version that you want to r
The problem is that you have many OpenERP systems out there which have been
used for years for other purposes than accounting.
During those years, accounting entries have been generated but these entries
were only used for e.g. one department or only sale/purchase of goods, ...
Real reconciliati
> The problem is that you have many OpenERP systems out there which have been
> used for years for other purposes than accounting.
> During those years, accounting entries have been generated but these entries
> were only used for e.g. one department or only sale/purchase of goods, ...
> Real recon
2013/11/4 Luc De Meyer (Noviat)
> The problem is that you have many OpenERP systems out there which have
> been used for years for other purposes than accounting.
> During those years, accounting entries have been generated but these
> entries were only used for e.g. one department or only sale/p
> Understand. Though, that's not working if you have a year without accounting
> entries at all and 1 (empty) opening period.
We have seen this situation before and we just removed the opening period. This
is of course a workaround that doesn't tackle the real issue.
> Considering all the case
To have it as reference, there is another old MP that treats the same topic
(and I think with the same solution):
https://code.launchpad.net/~account-report-core-editor/account-financial-report/fix-opening-period-search/+merge/162772
Regards.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-f
>We face this problem too, but we used to fix the not reconciled entries
>(Importing historical paymens too globally and in some cases just to close
>correctly all periods when we will start to use the accounting approach), it
>means, if we >report some periods in one way and other periods in ot
Review: Approve code review
Good improvement!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix/+merge/193717
Your team Account Report Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:account-financial-report.
--
Mailing list: http
Review: Needs Information
@Luc anything was done about this proposed change ?
> I have the impression that we move to a consensus to fix this issue by adding
> a parameter on the company settings with callback to current method if not
> defined.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/accou
No,
If you agree with the proposed approach, than I an make an MP.
Luc
www.noviat.com
Rusatiralaan 1, 1083 Brussel
+32 2 808 86 38
-Original Message-
From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Yannick
Vaucher @ Camptocamp
Sent: vrijdag 14 maart 2014 9:48
Hello,
The parameter/fallback solution seems reasonable assuming that period parameter
is not mandatory.
For me you can update the MP with that solution.
Also as the change will alter data structure the revision number of the module
must be increased in MP.
I'm putting the MP in work in prog
Review: Needs Fixing
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~luc-demeyer/account-financial-report/7.0-account_financial_report_webkit-first-special-fix/+merge/193717
Your team Account Report Core Editors is subscribed to branch
lp:account-financial-report.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~opene
18 matches
Mail list logo
