On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Stefan Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is more a bootloader issue than kernel issue. We need a
>> bootloader that resumes to PSPR instead of using a fixed memory
>> position for the resume address. I have this ready here, but im afraid
>> to test it on one
Hello.
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 21:59, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This is more a bootloader issue than kernel issue. We need a
> >> bootloader that resumes to PSPR instead of using a fixed memory
> >> position for the resum
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Stefan Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If OpenEZX would like to come out of the toys-for-developer corner we need to
> offer the user something. Most of them do not care about having a 2.6 kernel.
> They ask what else we can offer. And if we like to be a solid
Hello.
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:17, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Back to the topic that shows me that you are not interested in having such a
> > patch. I'm well aware that you are the driving force in OpenEZX for a lon
