[openflow-discuss] Rate limiting between two VMs

2011-06-08 Thread nauman.laghari
Hi, So here is the setup I've with Openvswitch 1.1.0 release running with brcompat module. It is all running on a single physical machine. Xen VM (a - 10.19.128.34) --- vif 1.0 -- (pibr102 - bridge) -- vif 2.0 --- Xen VM (b - 10.19.128.36) [root@vm-container-0-1 ~]# ovs-dpctl show pibr10

Re: [openflow-discuss] Rate limiting between two VMs

2011-06-08 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:28:00AM +0100, nauman.lagh...@bt.com wrote: > Also added a couple of flows for attaching to the queue > > > > [root@vm-container-0-1 ~]# ovs-ofctl add-flow pibr102 'priority=65535, > idle_timeout=5, dl_type=0x800, in_port=ANY, nw_src=ANY, > nw_dst=10.19.128.34, a

[openflow-discuss] Inconsistency of semantics in match and action for ARP

2011-06-08 Thread kk yap
Hi, Just wanted to bring this up to archive the issue for consideration later and as a cautionary note to those dealing with ARP using OpenFlow. The specific issue pertains to clarity and consistency of the OpenFlow specs. In OpenFlow (up till v1.1), we allow IP addresses in ARP to be match usin

[openflow-discuss] OpenRoads:SNMP

2011-06-08 Thread man monaco
Hello, Am trying to understand the details about what/when messages are exchanged between AP's and controller that creates the smooth hand off. Specifically, how SNMP contributed in improving the hand off in OpenRoads? I'll Appreciate it, if you could guide me to a paper/wiki-page that explain

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenRoads:SNMP

2011-06-08 Thread kk yap
Hi Landy, As explained (probably deep in the details), some configuration and event are triggered using SNMP. For example, for a switch to know of a client in OpenFlow, we have to look at packet-in from the client. This can take a while, esp. for clients that does not perform DHCP upon associati