On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Zoltán Lajos Kis
wrote:
> What might cause confusion (if there is any) is that the original OF 1.0
> implementation provided extension messages - OFP_EXT_QUEUE_MODIFY and
> OFP_EXT_QUEUE_DELETE - for managing queues. See e.g.,:
> http://yuba.stanford.edu/git/gitweb
hi,
perhaps you've already resolved your problem, but if not, I think there is a
typo in your rules below. I'll also put some debugging tips at the end.
On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:51 AM, Perhaps Lee <07xl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Without the the enqueue actions.
> ...
> ip,in_port=1,nw_dst=192.168
On Dec 8, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Jon Stan wrote:
> The following is the error message:
>
> 11:03:42.592 INFO [n.f.c.i.OFChannelHandler:New I/O server worker #2-4] New
> switch connection from /192.168.100.1:60059
> ...
> 11:03:42.636 WARN [n.f.c.i.C.s.notification:main] Switch
> 00:00:00:23:20:98:4
On Dec 8, 2013, at 3:17 AM, "meshenzcl" <363732...@qq.com> wrote:
> I want to compile openflow on a openwrt switch like the project pantou
> http://archive.openflow.org/wk/index.php/Pantou_:_OpenFlow_1.0_for_OpenWRT
>
> can you gave me some suggestion ? Your suggestions may precious for me.
hi,
I want to compile openflow on a openwrt switch like the project pantou
http://archive.openflow.org/wk/index.php/Pantou_:_OpenFlow_1.0_for_OpenWRT
can you gave me some suggestion ? Your suggestions may precious for me.___
openflow-discuss mailing list
op
