Re: [openflow-discuss] Ambiguity in Table 'action'

2011-04-10 Thread Tahir Rauf
Hi, Thanks Talayco. It is making sense now. Thanks for clarifying the concept. Regards On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Dan Talayco wrote: > A couple of quick notes. Hope they help. > > It's possible the controller has inserted a flow entry into the flow table > before it has sent the packet b

Re: [openflow-discuss] Ambiguity in Table 'action'

2011-04-10 Thread Dan Talayco
A couple of quick notes. Hope they help. It's possible the controller has inserted a flow entry into the flow table before it has sent the packet back as a packet out. It's also possible the controller has modified the packet before it sends it back as a packet out. Finally, it's possible that

[openflow-discuss] Ambiguity in Table 'action'

2011-04-10 Thread Tahir Rauf
Hi, I have little ambiguity in required output action "TABLE". My concept uptill now about openFlow matching is as follows. 1. Whenever a packet comes in switch, it is automatically sent to the first flow table for carrying out the matching process. 2. If no matching is found then it is sent to th