On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:17:49AM +0100, Thapar, Vishal wrote:
> If you program LOCAL Action for a pkt that would've been forwarded
> normally, what do you expect switch to do? Note that when I say switch
> I mean a hybrid switch.
>
> 1. Drop pkt.
> 2. Fwd pkt.
> 3. Throw error and not let you ad
scuss@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Clarification about NORMAL and LOCAL action
While I might get some pushback (hopefully I will) for saying this, I would
argue that NORMAL is not that well defined; at least, it is highly
implementation dependent.
LOCAL is pretty well defined since i
(Sorry if you get this twice. Bad email source addr used.)
While I might get some pushback (hopefully I will) for saying this, I would
argue that NORMAL is not that well defined; at least, it is highly
implementation dependent.
LOCAL is pretty well defined since in all implementations there i
Hi,
I have some confusion regarding difference between LOCAL and NORMAL action. My
[current] understanding is LOCAL refers to host's TCP/IP stack while NORMAL
states "Process packets using traditional non-Openflow Pipeline of the switch".
What I understand from it is that NORMAL action should o
