Re: [openflow-discuss] Non-OpenFlow SDN

2012-08-15 Thread Bob Lantz
These are excellent answers. I think you can find many more by doing reference chasing and also taking a look at citeseer and the ACM and IEEE digital libraries. On Aug 15, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Marcos Rogerio Salvador wrote: > If you think of GMPLS, where GMPLS protocol entities run as virtual >

Re: [openflow-discuss] Non-OpenFlow SDN

2012-08-15 Thread Marcos Rogerio Salvador
If you think of GMPLS, where GMPLS protocol entities run as virtual entities on servers or in (most probably private) clouds to control traffic forwarding (through LSPs) in GMPLS-incapable nodes, that is a case of a non-OF SDN architecture. Take DRAGON as an example. Comercial GMPLS stacks can run

Re: [openflow-discuss] Non-OpenFlow SDN

2012-08-15 Thread Jennifer Rexford
> A quick question: Are there any SDN architectures using something else at the > forwarding layer instead of OpenFlow? > (Unsuprisingly, Google returns nothing tangible for "software-defined > networking -openflow -cognitive -radio".) Earlier work on the Routing Control Platform (also called t

[openflow-discuss] Non-OpenFlow SDN

2012-08-15 Thread Volkan YAZICI
A quick question: Are there any SDN architectures using something else at the forwarding layer instead of OpenFlow? (Unsuprisingly, Google returns nothing tangible for "software-defined networking -openflow -cognitive -radio".) ___ openflow-discuss mailin