Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.1 ofp_packet_in padding clarification

2011-08-29 Thread Zoltán Lajos Kis
, 2011 7:43 PM To: Zoltán Lajos Kis Cc: openflow-disc...@mailman.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.1 ofp_packet_in padding clarification On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Zolt?n Lajos Kis wrote: I need some clarification on the data field for ofp_packet_in

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.1 ofp_packet_in padding clarification

2011-08-29 Thread kk yap
Lajos Kis Cc: openflow-disc...@mailman.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.1 ofp_packet_in padding clarification On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Zolt?n Lajos Kis wrote: I need some clarification on the data field for ofp_packet_in. The OF 1.1 spec contains

Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.1 ofp_packet_in padding clarification

2011-08-29 Thread Zoltán Lajos Kis
: Re: [openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.1 ofp_packet_in padding clarification Hi, Just to satisfy my own curiosity, won't the padding require the switch to parse the packet to insert the padding before sending it to the switch? This seems counter-intuitive since the packet is delivered

[openflow-discuss] OpenFlow 1.1 ofp_packet_in padding clarification

2011-08-26 Thread Zoltán Lajos Kis
Hi, I need some clarification on the data field for ofp_packet_in. The OF 1.1 spec contains the following comment: /* Ethernet frame, halfway through 32-bit word, so the IP header is 32-bit aligned. The amount of data is inferred from the length field in the header. Because of padding,