Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Bugzilla components for OpenFlow Plugin?

2016-11-21 Thread Shuva Jyoti Kar
Apologies for replying to an older email, but there is no "reconciliation" mode, just a switch/controller/node(controller instance) restart would trigger it . What is the exact flag/setting that you are looking for ? Maybe I could help you with that Thanks Shuva From: openflowplugin-dev-boun..

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] ODL: NIC - Issues to create basic OpenFlow rules using OF Plugin

2016-11-21 Thread Shuva Jyoti Kar
Hi Yrineu, 0.4.0-Snapshot is the one for stable/Be and that hasnot been changed after the stable/Be release. After Be, release the plugin model has changed, it’s the newer model now, and all functionality remains same. I went through both of your code snippets, and both look good!! Have a few

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Test comments

2016-11-21 Thread Shuva Jyoti Kar
Cool!! That’s awesome Thanks Luis From: openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:09 AM To: Luis Gomez Cc: openflowplugin-dev Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Tes

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] controller-switch reconciliation feature

2016-11-21 Thread Alexis de Talhouët
Luis, That configuration resides now in the YANG configuration file [0]. The YANG file provide default values, that can be overwritten in the the blueprint definition [1] as presented here [2]. Hope this helps, Alexis [0]: https://github.com/opendaylight/openflowplugin/blob/master/applications

[openflowplugin-dev] controller-switch reconciliation feature

2016-11-21 Thread Luis Gomez
I see the reconciliation setting was in 30-forwardingrules-manager.xml config file in Beryllium [1], does anyone know where is it in Boron/Carbon

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] ODL: NIC - Issues to create basic OpenFlow rules using OF Plugin

2016-11-21 Thread Yrineu Rodrigues
Hi Jozef, Thanks for your fast response! On NIC project we have an OpenFlow renderer to create basic firewall rules, ARP reply and others. Here's an example of 'Flo

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Test comments

2016-11-21 Thread Abhijit Kumbhare
Thanks Luis! On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to comment on what I sent a couple of weeks back: > > > On Nov 3, 2016, at 7:47 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > > Hi all, > > Few comments after looking at the OpenFlow CI test results: > > 1) As commented this mo

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Test comments

2016-11-21 Thread Luis Gomez
Hi all, Just wanted to comment on what I sent a couple of weeks back: > On Nov 3, 2016, at 7:47 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > > Hi all, > > Few comments after looking at the OpenFlow CI test results: > > 1) As commented this morning Carbon shows more stability than Boron in the > cbench and longe

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [yangtools-dev] REST performance regression

2016-11-21 Thread Luis Gomez
Patch seems to be OK (no impact on REST perf): https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-config-performance-only-carbon/plot/Flow%20Config%20Performance/

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [yangtools-dev] REST performance regression

2016-11-21 Thread Luis Gomez
This run in sandbox will finish before: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sandbox/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-config-performance-only-carbon/1/ > On Nov 21, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Jamo Luhrse

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [yangtools-dev] REST performance regression

2016-11-21 Thread Jamo Luhrsen
On 11/21/2016 09:08 AM, Robert Varga wrote: > On 11/21/2016 06:06 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: >> >> Thanks for the quick turnaround, it seems it is fixed now: >> >> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-config-performance-only-boron/plot/Flow%20Config

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [yangtools-dev] REST performance regression

2016-11-21 Thread Robert Varga
On 11/21/2016 06:06 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > > Thanks for the quick turnaround, it seems it is fixed now: > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-config-performance-only-boron/plot/Flow%20Config%20Performance/ >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [yangtools-dev] REST performance regression

2016-11-21 Thread Luis Gomez
Thanks for the quick turnaround, it seems it is fixed now: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-config-performance-only-boron/plot/Flow%20Config%20Performance/

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] ODL: NIC - Issues to create basic OpenFlow rules using OF Plugin

2016-11-21 Thread Jozef Bacigál
Hi Yrineu, can you provide more information what are you doing or trying to do. You question is too generic so maybe more information would help us to identify the problem you get and find together the best solution. Jozef From: Yrineu Rodrigues [mailto:yrineu.rodrig...@serro.com] Sent: Monday

[openflowplugin-dev] ODL: NIC - Issues to create basic OpenFlow rules using OF Plugin

2016-11-21 Thread Yrineu Rodrigues
Hi OpenFlow Plugin team, The NIC project is facing some issues when we try to create basic flows rules using the version "0.4.0-SNAPSHOT", please, can someone help us to understand the changes since Berillyum? Maybe some example to create a "FlowBuilder" applying the Boron/Carbon changes would be

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [yangtools-dev] REST performance regression

2016-11-21 Thread Lori Jakab
Hi, Lispflowmapping seems to be impacted too, both Boron and Carbon (also around Nov. 4): https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/lispflowmapping/job/lispflowmapping-csit-1node-performance-only-carbon/plot/ I saw this last week already, but didn't have time to investigate the cause, I just