Yes - that's what I thought. I will mark it OFP as OK.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
> No regression, this is well known bug 6177. Someone closed the bug for
> Boron/Carbon, at least in Beryllium the issue is still there.
>
> BR/Luis
>
>
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Anil V
No regression, this is well known bug 6177. Someone closed the bug for
Boron/Carbon, at least in Beryllium the issue is still there.
BR/Luis
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Anil Vishnoi wrote:
>
> I think luis can give better comment about these CSIT test failures, i am not
> sure what was th
I think luis can give better comment about these CSIT test failures, i am
not sure what was the state of these test before. Luis, do you see any of
these test is failing because of any possible regression?
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare
wrote:
> Anil - what do you think of the
Anil - what do you think of these Beryllium clustering (Helium design) test
case failures? Particularly the first one below.
The status of the test case says as non-critical (and the second one below
says as because of bug 6177 which was existing in Beryllium):
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/re
Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team,
There are some distribution test failures in Beryllium SR4 Build 20161017
related to your project. Could you or someone from your team please take a
moment to mark these issues in the spreadsheet [1] as "OKAY" to release or
"BLOCKING" and requires a respin of Berylliu
