at Cisco); Anil Vishnoi;
raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Subhash Singh; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
I thought the fix on the master is not changing the default behavior. If it is,
then regardless of which approach we take we will have a differ
pe.com;
> Abhijit Kumbhare ; Subhash Singh <
> subhash_si...@criterionnetworks.com>; Luis Gomez Palacios <
> ece...@gmail.com>; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
>
> The next SR is July end - and I believe you w
om; Abhijit
> Kumbhare ; Subhash Singh
> ; Luis Gomez Palacios
> ; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
>
> The next SR is July end - and I believe you will have the actual fix in the
> master & not a workaround - r
; raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit
Kumbhare ; Subhash Singh
; Luis Gomez Palacios ;
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
The next SR is July end - and I believe you will have the actual fix in the
master & not a workaround - right? If that is
be omitted and DS latency for inventory will be the same as by OVS
>>> >=2.3.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* Anil Vishnoi
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2016 9:44 AM
>>>
>>> *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare
>
esday, May 10, 2016 5:32 PM
To: Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: Anil Vishnoi; raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh; Luis
Gomez Palacios; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
Jozef,
On a sec
bhijit Kumbhare
>> *Cc:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
>> raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh;
>> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios
>> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
>>
>
IES at Cisco);
> raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh;
> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios
> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
> wrote:
>
>> T
gal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh;
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare
mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>&
Nope, in stable/beryllium we add just this on/off flag, with default
>>>> setting on OFF table features.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36506/3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jozef
>>>>
:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
>> *Cc:* Abhijit Kumbhare; raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare;
>> Subhash Singh; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez
>> Palacios
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
&g
Anil Vishnoi
> *Sent:* Monday, May 9, 2016 7:21 PM
> *To:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> *Cc:* Abhijit Kumbhare; raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash
> Singh; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios
>
> *Subject:*
...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh;
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
okay, although it's been done for li plugin, but i think it will change the
default behavior between two SR (SR2 and SR-3).
On Mon, May 9,
X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
> raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh;
> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios
>
> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
>
> was this patch merged to stable/beryllium as well?
>
>
(jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
raphael.amo...@hpe.com; Abhijit Kumbhare; Subhash Singh;
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Luis Gomez Palacios
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
was this patch merged to stable/beryllium as well?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:21 AM
om:* Abhijit Kumbhare
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2016 9:20 PM
>> *To:* Subhash Singh
>> *Cc:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco);
>> Abhijit Kumbhare; raphael.amo...@hpe.com;
>> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
>> *Subject:* Re:
> Abhijit Kumbhare; raphael.amo...@hpe.com;
> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
>
> Hi Jozef,
>
> Will you be putting https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559 into
> stable/beryllium after sometime has passed or do you think i
, April 25, 2016 9:20 PM
To: Subhash Singh
Cc: Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco); Abhijit
Kumbhare; raphael.amo...@hpe.com; openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features
Hi Jozef,
Will you be putting https://git.opendaylight.org
Hi Jozef,
Will you be putting https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559 into
stable/beryllium after sometime has passed or do you think its better to
avoid it altogether in stable/beryllium?
Thanks,
Abhijit
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Subhash Singh <
subhash_si...@criterionnetworks.com>
+[Anandhi]
--
Regards,
Subhash Kumar Singh
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi everyone, mainly guys from NIC and DIDM,
>
> I would ask you if you can read and talk about the bug 5464 table features
>
> https://bugs.opendayli
20 matches
Mail list logo
