On 15/02/07, Nicolas Spalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It shouldn't be too long before we have the new OFL out.
Then I can adapt the RDF metadata skeleton which was suggested in an
earlier thread so we can better integrate this font-specific license
into the OFLB.
Please post if there's an
> Hi, Jon,
>
> Victor Gaultney's investigation of this font, as reported in an
> earlier email, clearly shows that this font contains exact copies of
> other people's glyphs where the permission for such copying is not
> clear at all.
>
> To me, that suggests this font is a legal can of worms tha
> [...]
> For Open Font License support, we are really just waiting for the
> metadata so I can slap it into OFLB...I'm not sure where that is at, and
> is the only reason this is not added to the site...
>
> Jon
Great.
It shouldn't be too long before we have the new OFL out.
Then I can adapt t
