Hi,
Robert Martinez wrote:
also should we use FONTLOG or Fontlog (is there a reason for
capitalizing it?)
I think it's simply that the name FONTLOG follows the name README and
INSTALL as found in software distributions. People say: Read the
README so we say Read the FONTLOG.
Ben
--
Ben
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 11:24 +, Ben Weiner a écrit :
Hi,
Robert Martinez wrote:
also should we use FONTLOG or Fontlog (is there a reason for
capitalizing it?)
I think it's simply that the name FONTLOG follows the name README and
INSTALL as found in software distributions.
I hope the launched site will stick to ofl+pd, and in future will be
ofl+cc0+gplv3later+fe. The wiki confusion is my fault because it talks as if
either is real. It is a wiki though, so please just dive in and fix the bugs
as you see them :)
Regards, Dave
On 22 Mar 2009, 11:36 AM, Ben Weiner
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Kess Vargavind vargav...@gmail.com:
While personally I would prefer FONTLOG, since all capitals stands out
among the other files. And to me, all capitals denote a file with
metacontents. I did not like this naming convention a few years ago,
but its
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Actually my main concern was the use of the filname on the webpage/wiki.
When you read FONTLOG there all the time there is no use to make it stand
out - in contrast to when you brows your local files.
This is why I would be happy to ditch the capitals.
Ben Weiner wrote:
Hi
Robert Martinez wrote:
i'm about to explore the wiki and sometimes i find some glitches like:
http://openfontlibrary.org/wiki/Other_licenses - states only OFL
public domain are allowed
http://openfontlibrary.org/wiki/License - states ...All the font
files you can
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Actually my main concern was the use of the filname on the webpage/wiki.
When you read FONTLOG there all the time there is no use to make it stand
out - in contrast to when you brows your local files.
This is why I would be happy
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Actually my main concern was the use of the filname on the webpage/wiki.
When you read FONTLOG there all the time there is no use to make it stand
out - in contrast to when you brows your
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
I don't know if just removing often is enough. Then you say everything
here is free software. but there is also public domain stuff,
Public domain stuff is free.
the complexety of mixing the free software definition with a clean statement
what we
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
I don't know if just removing often is enough. Then you say everything
here is free software. but there is also public domain stuff,
Public domain stuff is free.
You are right.
I was just refering to the use of free
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
I don't know if just removing often is enough. Then you say everything
here is free software. but there is also public domain stuff,
You are right.
I was just refering to the use of free
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
I don't know if just removing often is enough. Then you say everything
here is free software. but there is also public domain stuff,
You are
just a thought for the future:
we should offer contributors to dodge an extra account creation with
support for openID.
wikimedia seems to have an extension for this:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID
what about the cchost part of the page?
ccHost doesn't have openid yet...it would be good to have though!!!
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Robert Martinez m...@mray.de wrote:
just a thought for the future:
we should offer contributors to dodge an extra account creation with support
for openID.
wikimedia seems to have an
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
just a thought for the future:
we should offer contributors to dodge an extra account creation with support
for openID.
wikimedia seems to have an extension for this:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID
Please add this to the TODO list :)
Robert Martinez wrote:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
just a thought for the future:
we should offer contributors to dodge an extra account creation with
support
for openID.
wikimedia seems to have an extension for this:
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
(let's call them. open source fonts :P -yay!)
I am strongly against the term open source because I believe it is
self-defeating; it encourages proprietary software mixed with free
software.
IMHO, the open source community is rubbish at expanding free
2009/3/22 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Please add this to the TODO list :)
where can i find the TODO list?
sorry. forgot the search option - but it should be linked somewhere :P
It is the first link of the 2nd section of
http://openfontlibrary.org/wiki/Main_Page ? :)
are there any attempts to integrate OFLB into fontmatrix just like
OCL is integrated into Inkscape?
this would rock.
19 matches
Mail list logo
