On 3/6/10, fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
> for MOST authors of software libraries, that is simply false. Programmers
> understand that releasing their software libraries as proprietary will make
> more money in the long run.
Oh come on, what sort of long run are you talking about? Everybody
knows w
fontfree...@aol.com skribis:
> For many software authors, yes, they can make more with open source, but
> for MOST authors of software libraries, that is simply false. Programmers
> understand that releasing their software libraries as proprietary will make
> more money in the long run.
The w
> For many software authors, yes, they can make more with open source, but for
> MOST authors of software libraries, that is simply false. Programmers
> understand that releasing their software libraries as proprietary will make
> more money in the long run.
If the goal is to make money on supp
>I think that many authors of software libraries - programmers -
>understand how they can make more money with free software than with
>proprietary software, which is why so much free software library code
>exists. This is less true of applications programmers, and even less
>true of type desig
