And document the process on the wiki!
Extra knowledge and skills for the community at large
E
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:39:59 -0500, Ed wrote:
> Hi, Dave,
>
> I agree with the idea that legacy non-Unicode fonts on OFLB represent
> opportunities for modernisation to Unicode.
>
> Best - Ed
>
>>
>>
Hi, Dave,
I agree with the idea that legacy non-Unicode fonts on OFLB represent
opportunities for modernisation to Unicode.
Best - Ed
>
> I am known for being very lasseiz-faire about what OFLB should accept,
> and indeed I think we should accept non-Unicode fonts since we can
> then work to mak
On 2 December 2010 17:05, Ed wrote:
> Hi, everyone!
>
> Just noticed that "ShadheenLipi" by openbangla is not a Unicode font ...
>
> Naturally, as the font is not Unicode, Fontaine reports this font as
> covering "Basic Latin" and "Western European".
>
> While the "Description" statement says that
Hi, everyone!
Just noticed that "ShadheenLipi" by openbangla is not a Unicode font ...
Naturally, as the font is not Unicode, Fontaine reports this font as
covering "Basic Latin" and "Western European".
While the "Description" statement says that this is an "ANSI" font, it
would be much better i
