Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-08-10 Thread Jon Phillips
That would be great! On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 17:04 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote: 2008/8/10 Jon Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]: And so we have it :) Then I'll keep this to my self...post away Gustavo! Sadly he told me offlist he unsubscribed this afternoon. If he starts blogging, I will ask if

Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-08-09 Thread Gustavo Ferreira
my point is: i don't want to discuss, i want to work on fonts. *that* is my job. sorry for misspelling your name. On Aug 9, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Jon Phillips wrote: Gustavo, I'm not telling you want to do, but offering helpful suggestions that would help us construct a better project. This

Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-08-08 Thread Jon Phillips
Gustavo, one way you could help is by putting a listing of these awesome new font 2.0 sites up on the OFLB wiki...then we can track things that are free and/or open and what features OFLB needs. Jon On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 21:58 -0300, Gustavo Ferreira wrote: http://www.fontembedding.com/

Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-07-26 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:11 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote: 2008/7/25 Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [...] I apologies for being hasty with that email, and retract the statement that Bitstream isn't involved in W3C at all. Sorry. OK What I meant way, Bitstream are not involved in the W3C CSS

Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-07-24 Thread Christopher Fynn
Dave Crossland wrote: 2008/7/23 Christopher Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: These are the same people that released the report trashing free fonts They were shit-talking proprietary software redistributable at zero price - freeware - and all the problems they identify would be solvable if those

Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-07-24 Thread Dave Crossland
2008/7/24 Christopher Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dave Crossland wrote: They say that EOT will be a W3C specification. http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/01/ Microsoft can submit whatever they want to the W3C, that doesn't mean it WILL become a specification. Adobe are supporting this as well -

Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-07-24 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 00:35 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote: [...] Bitstream hold plenty of software patents on all this stuff, and they aren't involved in the W3C, so anyone who wants to implement anything like EOT is going to be screwed by them. Bitstream (as I've mentioned to you before) is an

Re: [Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-07-23 Thread Christopher Fynn
http://www.fontembedding.com/ = Ascender. These are the same people that released the report trashing free fonts http://www.ascendercorp.com/webfontstudy.html Dave Crossland wrote: 2008/7/21 Gustavo Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.fontembedding.com/ curious to hear your thoughts

[Openfontlibrary] FontEmbedding.com

2008-07-20 Thread Gustavo Ferreira
http://www.fontembedding.com/ curious to hear your thoughts about this... :-) regards, - gustavo. ___ Openfontlibrary mailing list Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary