When will we hear how the voting went?
Thanks,
Dave Forslund
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "openhealth" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Will,
It was unfortunate that the term "founding" members was used during the
discussion and though I had used the term in inverted commas, I must
admit that it was my fingers that shoot faster than my brains at that
early hour of the morning of the Inaugural meeting (7 a.m. local time).
How
On Apr 26, 2006, at 5:48 AM, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
> A point or two on the notion of "founding members", for what it is
> worth:
>
> There is no "founding member" category of membership in the ROS
> process
> for incorporating OSHCA...just Associate and Ordinary membersand
> these cat
John,
Yes...a wiki page will be great for this so that all the old timers can
pitch in. The openhealth list actually started in 1998 not long after
Brian Bray, Dave Scott and I launched Minoru. Brian conceived
itthere were a couple of press releases if I remember correctly and
announcem
Dear Joseph,
It would be nice to have this story told in the future OSHCA website (even a
short version).
I myself remember being present at an AMIA session a few years ago where I
believe it was born the ideia of starting the openhealth list ( I may be
mistaken).
Regards,
John
-
A point or two on the notion of "founding members", for what it is worth:
There is no "founding member" category of membership in the ROS process
for incorporating OSHCA...just Associate and Ordinary membersand
these categories apply after incorporation too.
If there are founding members
Will Ross wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Tim.Churches wrote:
>
> - - - - < a bunch of really well written stuff, followed by > - - - -
>
>> ...Note that members do
>> NOT have to agree with every last word of the constitution, but they
>> must agree to abide by it. That is analogous with n
David Forslund wrote:
> ( I've been curious why "protem" was used for the committee name instead
> of "protemp"?)
It is an abbreviation for "pro tempore". I have always said "pro temp"
too, but I gather that "pro tem" and "pro tem." are also widely used. I
think that "protem" is rather more pom
On Apr 25, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> Will,
>
> You are right! The flawed process was an attempt to get the OSHCA
> formally retgisterd, start a web site and get going. Endless
> changes and debate are not going to do this.
>
> Therefore, with this somewhat awkward, ev
On Apr 25, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Tim.Churches wrote:
- - - - < a bunch of really well written stuff, followed by > - - - -
> ...Note that members do
> NOT have to agree with every last word of the constitution, but they
> must agree to abide by it. That is analogous with national or state
> law
> -
10 matches
Mail list logo
