I couldn't agree more with what Matt said. Perhaps it's incumbent upon us to
provide some examples/whitepapers/proof/etc of how the VA will benefit from
this proposed relationship. It's very likely that they do not understand that
the virtuous spiral which worked so well inside the VA to
can-of-worms
1. How good does it have to be? Is 5% leakage of sensitive information OK?
2. Another view: ALL of the information is sensitive.
3. Another view: The patient MUST have input as to who can see what.
/can-of-worms
- Original Message -
From: Will Ross
To:
It worries me when a single organization is in a position to set the criterion
for certification and set the price. If being certified is required as entry
to some markets, then the organization is in a position similar to a government
regulator. To break up this monopoly, I would suggest
Tim,
I'd be interested to hear why you feel that way about the report. I have
read comments by others praising it. Perhaps they have missed something.
-mlp-
- Original Message -
From: Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openhealth@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006
