Generally just add what project you think are missing with full descriptions
about what they are. Also feel free to change the names of things to be
trademark accurate/neutral.
-FT
On 4/6/06, Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > It seems to me that Fre
I meant that I am 80% finished with the 3 that I am reviewing. Thanks for
pointing out spelling and grammar mistakes. However you can just create a
user on the wiki and make corrections when you find mistakes. Everyone is
invited to do this
-FT
On 4/6/06, James Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> It seems to me that Fred is going to review just these, and others are
> supposed to chiop in with some reviews or part of reviews of any other
> EMRs worth talking about.
>
> Open VistA remains to be reviewed and OSCAR.
May I suggest that we use the label VistA as
Is someone going to review OpenEMed? I'm not sure who is using it, but
it has been the basis for several EMR efforts and has been downloaded
some 15,000+ times from Sourceforge (?!). It will have full support
for the ASTM CCR shortly.
Thanks,
Dave
Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> It seems to me
It seems to me that Fred is going to review just these, and others are supposed
to chiop in with some reviews or part of reviews of any other EMRs worth
talking about.
Open VistA remains to be reviewed and OSCAR.
Zope based SPIRIT? and OIO are two others that come to mind. While the ones
r
On Apr 4, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Fred Trotter wrote:
> EHR review on LinuxMedNews...
> http://www.linuxmednews.com/1144128464/index_html
>
> At this point, I have finished about 80% of the reviews...
Hi Fred
The site lists only 3 EMRs, so I wonder what is meant by 80%. Do you
mean you have complet
Fred Trotter wrote:
> I hope that everyone has seen the new announcement of the latest work
> on the
> EHR review on LinuxMedNews. I hope that by using stats drawn directly from
> the projects version control systems, I can make the reviews more
> objective.
> Here is the link to the LMN announce
I hope that everyone has seen the new announcement of the latest work on the
EHR review on LinuxMedNews. I hope that by using stats drawn directly from
the projects version control systems, I can make the reviews more objective.
Here is the link to the LMN announcement.
http://www.linuxmednews.com
