Re: [openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-07-03 Thread Adrian Midgley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Beller wrote: > You're right. I looked for a "discussion" or "comment" tab on wiki > page, but couldn't find one; "Talk" MediaWiki, best available Wiki software at present as used by http://ganfyd.org which I'm involved in. > and I though

[openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-07-02 Thread Stephen Beller
You're right. I looked for a "discussion" or "comment" tab on wiki page, but couldn't find one; and I thought about editing the wiki, but didn't want to assume I was welcomed to inject my questions and views into Bill's fine work. Nevertheless, I have no problem with anything from my blog being

Re: [openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-07-02 Thread Adrian Midgley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > > I did, however, have some concern regarding your FOSS philosophy > > > discussion at http://freeopensourcesoftware.org/index.php? > > > > > title=FOSS_Philosophy. There appears to be a double-s

[openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-07-02 Thread Stephen Beller
It's a pleasure corresponding with the OS community, Bill. I'm learning a great deal and getting good guidance. I'm now working with others in this community to offer an acceptable FOSS license and for our continuity of care record application later this month. --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com

Re: [openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-07-02 Thread Wm. Stewart
Hi Stephen, thanks to you and the thoughtful responses of your correspondents. I essentially agree with the responses! Cheers, Bill Stephen Beller wrote: > > FYI - I just responded to two excellent comments on my post about > Bill's FOSS-COSS philosophy distinction, which is at: > https://w

[openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-07-01 Thread Stephen Beller
FYI - I just responded to two excellent comments on my post about Bill's FOSS-COSS philosophy distinction, which is at: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g? blogID=25132358&postID=5801635888685043227&page=1 --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Beller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You've do

[openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-07-01 Thread Stephen Beller
FYI - I just responded to two excellent comments on my post about Bill's FOSS-COSS philosophy distinction, which is at: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g? blogID=25132358&postID=5801635888685043227&page=1">this link. --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Beller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[openhealth] Re: FreeOpenSourceSoftware.org -- New Wiki

2008-06-30 Thread Stephen Beller
You've done a great job on the wiki, Bill! I did, however, have some concern regarding your FOSS philosophy discussion at http://freeopensourcesoftware.org/index.php? title=FOSS_Philosophy. There appears to be a double-standard by FOSS purists about what is worthy of financial compensation and w