Jason Tan Boon Teck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well anything making the work of an evil mind more difficult is worth it :-)
Total security being a myth.
Nanda
On 5/12/06, Franklin M. Siler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 11, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Jason Tan Boon Teck wro
On May 12, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Bhaskar, KS wrote:
>
> The way to patch a live CD is to make up a new one.
That was my general implication: I have enough CD-Rs floating around
without having to version them.
I've thought about making up CD's for use on questionable hospital
computers (e.g.,
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:29 -0500, Franklin M. Siler wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
> Don't get me wrong; I think that bootable CD's are handy for a
> variety of purposes. I just don't think security is one of them.
> While it's true that CD's have the property that backdoors can't be
>
On May 12, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Jason Tan Boon Teck wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Franklin M. Siler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On May 11, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Jason Tan Boon Teck wrote:
>>> BeatriX has a nifty feature - copy image of CD to HDD, and then use
>>> that
>>> image from that point onwards. It's
On 5/12/06, Franklin M. Siler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 11, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Jason Tan Boon Teck wrote:
>
> > BeatriX has a nifty feature - copy image of CD to HDD, and then use
> > that
> > image from that point onwards. It's remains as a single image file
> > on the
> > HDD and
On May 11, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Jason Tan Boon Teck wrote:
> BeatriX has a nifty feature - copy image of CD to HDD, and then use
> that
> image from that point onwards. It's remains as a single image file
> on the
> HDD and would require a uber l33t to hack that.
I'm afraid that statement u
BeatriX has a nifty feature - copy image of CD to HDD, and then use that
image from that point onwards. It's remains as a single image file on the
HDD and would require a uber l33t to hack that. Access time is now limited
to HDD speed.
On 5/11/06, Nandalal Gunaratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
"Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has it's benefits, but not a great practical solution, nor safe
> enough, as one may want to assume.
[KSB] Like perfection, absolute security does not exist in this
universe. All we can do is make intelligent trade-offs!
Yes! This tru
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:55 -0500, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>
>
> "Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me take an even stronger position. If you really want to secure
> your network of PCs, you should run the OS off a Linux live CD-ROM
> which
> cannot be infected. It is so
"Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me take an even stronger position. If you really want to secure
your network of PCs, you should run the OS off a Linux live CD-ROM which
cannot be infected. It is so straightforward to create customized Linux
live CDs, that I see no reason to
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 05:45 -0500, Jason Tan Boon Teck wrote:
> http://www.scmagazine.com/uk/news/article/557899/zombie+hacker+pleads
> +guilty+hospital+infection/
>
> Zombie hacker pleads guilty to hospital infection
>
> A U.S. man has pleaded guilty of creating a zombie network of 50,000
http://www.scmagazine.com/uk/news/article/557899/zombie+hacker+pleads+guilty+hospital+infection/
Zombie hacker pleads guilty to hospital infection
A U.S. man has pleaded guilty of creating a zombie network of 50,000
computers to launch a devastating attack against a Seattle hospital.
Twenty-y
12 matches
Mail list logo
