Michael> I'm a bit ill, expect to work on it tomorrow. Could you
Michael> post the patch with these dumps?
The patch is below.
Testing on PCI Express/Arbel systems (with dual 3.2 GHz Xeons) with FW
4.5.3, I've seen somewhat different behavior. Even after setting
IPOIB_NUM_WC to 1 so tha
>Are you at 4.6.1 now on all your PCIe HCAs ? Not sure whether 4.5.3
does indeed work
>but it sounds like something has changed for the worse since Roland had
it working.
>Thanks.
>-- Hal
I had problems with the 4.3.5 firmware and it seemed to work with my
early
version of the 4.6.0-rc4 f
>Yes, some mechanism of allocating unique "local OS administered"
>service IDs (see section A.3.2.3.3 of the spec) is required.
Thanks, that's what I was looking for in the spec, but couldn't find it.
>Or did I misunderstand and you were just worried about possible
>service ID collisions? In tha
Hi Josh,
[You wrote:]
I've tried with the latest from
SVN as well as the exact same kernel/rootFS you were using, and I still
can't ping between nodes. I'm just doing 'modprobe ib_mthca; modprobe
ib_ipoib; ifconfig ...; ping ...' on the same two nodes. Am I missing
something?
Anything in /var/
Josh> Roland, Alright...I'm not sure whats going on. I just now
Josh> got a chance to test this out and it still isn't working.
Josh> I've tried with the latest from SVN as well as the exact
Josh> same kernel/rootFS you were using, and I still can't ping
Josh> between nodes. I
Hi,
Attached are the ARs I recorded (categorized as related to PF contract or
other) and my notes from yesterday's PDR. I took the liberty of assigning the
ARs :-)
Let me know if I missed anything or whether there are any other comments or
questions.
Thanks.
-- Hal
PDR ARs (from 12/20/0
Title: RE: [PATCH] Re: [openib-general] Re: IPoIB Failure CQ overrun
I'm a bit ill, expect to work on it tomorrow.
Could you post the patch with these dumps?
> -Original Message-
> From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mon, December 20, 2004 7:56 PM
> To: Michael S.
