RE: [openib-general] HCA Firmware

2005-05-09 Thread Tziporet Koren
The last official release from Mellanox is 3.3.2 and one of the major new features is MSIX support. Tziporet   -Original Message-From: Shirley Ma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:36 PMTo: Hal RosenstockCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openib-general@openib.or

[openib-general] CM ID destruction callback for kernel CM ?

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Sean, The kernel CM is currently capable of destroying the CM ID at the end of the callback by setting ret to other than 0: * Users may not call ib_destroy_cm_id while in the context of this callback; * however, returning a non-zero value instructs the communication manager to * destroy the

[openib-general] Re: user-mode verbs on Itanium

2005-05-09 Thread Grant Grundler
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:50:22PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hello, Grant! > Thanks for comments on the perftest. > I think fixed all bug you found. probably - welcome > I just did > > >svn mv https://openib.org/svn/trunk/contrib/mellanox/perftest > >https://openib.org/svn/gen2/trunk/s

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] SDP: remove redundant setting of sk_family

2005-05-09 Thread Libor Michalek
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:41:09PM -0700, Tom Duffy wrote: > sk_alloc() already takes care of setting sk_family to proto. No need to > do it a second time in sdp. Thanks, applied and commited. -Libor ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@ope

[openib-general] [PATCH][25/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_IA_ATTR

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel24/dat/dat.h linux-kernel25/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel24/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 14:05:28.655967000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel25/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 14:08:31.214971000 -0700 @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ }; /*

Re: [openib-general] in need of a simple ulp

2005-05-09 Thread Sean Hefty
Jeff Carr wrote: I didn't notice this error. In any case, it was something I did wrong; I went back and did a simple check with your code and it is ok. I do notice though that you can generate: May 5 16:31:50 localhost kernel: ib_mthca :09:00.0: 1a0084/0: error CQE -> QPN 1a0406, WQE @ 000

[openib-general] [PATCH][26/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_SOCK_ADDR and DAT_SOCK_ADDR6

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel25/dat/dat.h linux-kernel26/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel25/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 14:08:31.214971000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel26/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 14:12:56.760962000 -0700 @@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ typedef void

[openib-general] [PATCH][22/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_UPCALL_OBJECT

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel21/dat/dat.h linux-kernel22/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel21/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:32:35.92396 -0700 +++ linux-kernel22/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:55:55.040963000 -0700 @@ -934,17 +934,17 @@ typedef

[openib-general] [PATCH][23/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_EVD_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel22/dat/dat.h linux-kernel23/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel22/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:55:55.040963000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel23/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 14:02:35.073961000 -0700 @@ -955,13 +955,13 @@ D

[openib-general] [PATCH][24/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_LMR_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel23/dat/dat.h linux-kernel24/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel23/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 14:02:35.073961000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel24/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 14:05:28.655967000 -0700 @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ } DAT_REGI

[openib-general] [PATCH][20/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_SOFTWARE_EVENT_DATA

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel19/dat/dat.h linux-kernel20/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel19/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:28:13.273961000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel20/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:29:50.153961000 -0700 @@ -877,9 +877,9 @@ } DAT_PZ_A

[openib-general] [PATCH][17/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_CR_ARRIVAL_EVENT_DATA

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel16/dat/dat.h linux-kernel17/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel16/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:19:22.189961000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel17/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:23:46.47396 -0700 @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ } DAT_SP_H

[openib-general] [PATCH][21/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_EVENT

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel20/dat/dat.h linux-kernel21/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel20/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:29:50.153961000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel21/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:32:35.92396 -0700 @@ -914,11 +914,11 @@ /* Eve

[openib-general] [PATCH][16/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_RMR_BIND_COMPLETION_EVENT_DATA

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel15/dat/dat.h linux-kernel16/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel15/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:15:04.793961000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel16/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:19:22.189961000 -0700 @@ -782,11 +782,11 @@ };

[openib-general] [PATCH][19/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_ASYNCH_ERROR_EVENT_DATA

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel18/dat/dat.h linux-kernel19/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel18/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:26:21.135961000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel19/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:28:13.273961000 -0700 @@ -835,11 +835,11 @@ * affil

[openib-general] [PATCH][18/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_CONNECTION_EVENT_DATA

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel17/dat/dat.h linux-kernel18/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel17/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:23:46.47396 -0700 +++ linux-kernel18/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:26:21.135961000 -0700 @@ -820,11 +820,11 @@ };

[openib-general] [PATCH][15/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_DTO_COMPLETION_EVENT_DATA

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel14/dat/dat.h linux-kernel15/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel14/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:58:35.516881000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel15/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 13:15:04.793961000 -0700 @@ -774,12 +774,12 @@ /* DTO

[openib-general] [PATCH][12/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_PSP_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel11/dat/dat.h linux-kernel12/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel11/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:47:11.494001000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel12/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:50:54.204001000 -0700 @@ -695,12 +695,12 @@ /* PSP

[openib-general] [PATCH][13/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_RSP_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel12/dat/dat.h linux-kernel13/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel12/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:50:54.204001000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel13/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:54:15.334001000 -0700 @@ -704,12 +704,12 @@ /* RSP

[openib-general] [PATCH][14/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_CR_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel13/dat/dat.h linux-kernel14/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel13/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:54:15.334001000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel14/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:58:35.516881000 -0700 @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ * encode

[openib-general] [PATCH][10/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_SRQ_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel9/dat/dat.h linux-kernel10/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel9/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:37:03.881002000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel10/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:40:19.541004000 -0700 @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ DAT_

[openib-general] [PATCH][11/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_PZ_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel10/dat/dat.h linux-kernel11/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel10/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:40:19.541004000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel11/dat/dat.h2005-05-09 12:47:11.494001000 -0700 @@ -689,9 +689,9 @@ /* PZ Pa

[openib-general] [PATCH][9/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_SRQ_ATTR

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel8/dat/dat.h linux-kernel9/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel8/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:30:15.36400 -0700 +++ linux-kernel9/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:37:03.881002000 -0700 @@ -670,11 +670,11 @@ #define

[openib-general] [PATCH][8/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_EP_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel7/dat/dat.h linux-kernel8/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel7/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:17:29.401004000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel8/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:30:15.36400 -0700 @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ DAT_E

[openib-general] [PATCH][7/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_EP_ATTR

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel6/dat/dat.h linux-kernel7/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel6/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:09:01.001003000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel7/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:17:29.401004000 -0700 @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ }; /* End

[openib-general] [PATCH][6/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_RMR_PARAM

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel5/dat/dat.h linux-kernel6/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel5/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 11:56:32.97702 -0700 +++ linux-kernel6/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 12:09:01.001003000 -0700 @@ -563,13 +563,13 @@ (DA

[openib-general] [PATCH][5/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_NAMED_ATTR

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel4/dat/dat.h linux-kernel5/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel4/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 11:50:52.631016000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel5/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 11:56:32.97702 -0700 @@ -361,10 +361,10 @@ typedef ch

[openib-general] [PATCH][4/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_RMR_TRIPLET

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel3/dat/dat.h linux-kernel4/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel3/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 11:36:42.18400 -0700 +++ linux-kernel4/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 11:50:52.631016000 -0700 @@ -531,12 +531,12 @@ DAT

[openib-general] [PATCH][3/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_LMR_TRIPLET

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -ur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel2/dat/dat.h linux-kernel3/dat/dat.h --- linux-kernel2/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 11:24:22.839026000 -0700 +++ linux-kernel3/dat/dat.h 2005-05-09 11:36:42.18400 -0700 @@ -524,12 +524,12 @@ * dat_lmr_

[openib-general] [PATCH][1/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_PROVIDER_ATTR

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: linux-kernel/test/dapltest/test/dapl_fft_queryinfo.c === --- linux-kernel/test/dapltest/test/dapl_fft_queryinfo.c(revision 2290) +++ linux-kernel/test/dapltest/test/dapl_fft_

[openib-general] [PATCH][2/26] kDAPL: Remove typedef DAT_PROVIDER_INFO

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur -X /home/tduffy/dontdiff linux-kernel/dat/api.c linux-kernel2/dat/api.c --- linux-kernel/dat/api.c 2005-05-09 13:44:25.02396 -0700 +++ linux-kernel2/dat/api.c 2005-05-09 13:47:18.87396 -0700 @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@

[openib-general] [PATCH][0/26] kDAPL: Remove typedefs in dat.h

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
The following set of patches removes the use of typedef for all the structs defined in dat/dat.h. Please apply in order. Signed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Your friendly openib janitor. ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.or

[openib-general] panic: ib_sa_mcmember_rec_callback

2005-05-09 Thread Shirley Ma
Did anyone see below panic before? I hit this panic, after I've updated the stack to the most recent one, it couldn't be reproducible. I guess some recent checkin has fixed this problem. == Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] SMP NR_CPUS=128 NUMA PSERIES LPAR

Re: [openib-general] HCA Firmware

2005-05-09 Thread Shirley Ma
> I don't recall if there are issues running with 3.2.0 or not. 3.2.0 has no problem. Even 3.1.0 works fine for me. Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR 97006-6063 Phone(Fax): (503) 578-7638 ___ openib-general mail

RE: [openib-general] Re: A Couple of User CM Questions

2005-05-09 Thread Rimmer, Todd
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 15:32, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 14:39, Libor Michalek wrote: > > > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:22:17PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > Hi Libor, > > > > > > > > I have a couple of questions pertaining to the user CM. > > > > > > > > 1. It appear

Re: [openib-general] Re: A Couple of User CM Questions

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 15:32, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 14:39, Libor Michalek wrote: > > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:22:17PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > Hi Libor, > > > > > > I have a couple of questions pertaining to the user CM. > > > > > > 1. It appears that device (a

RE: [openib-general] Re: A Couple of User CM Questions

2005-05-09 Thread Rimmer, Todd
> > > 2. Any idea on how device would be supported ? Would this > just be with > > > an IB device number or a string like "mthca0" ? > > > > I was thinking that the destination GID in the req_event > path record > > would be sufficient to identify the local device/port, but I had not > > tak

[openib-general] Re: A Couple of User CM Questions

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 14:39, Libor Michalek wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:22:17PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Hi Libor, > > > > I have a couple of questions pertaining to the user CM. > > > > 1. It appears that device (and port) are not supported either incoming > > or outgoing. So if

[openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r2275 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/ulp/sdp

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 07:17, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > s/seperat/separat/g > in: > trunk/src/userspace/mstflint/flint.cpp:4644 > trunk/src/userspace/management/osm/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c:272: > trunk/src/userspace/management/osm/include/opensm/osm_port.h:139 > utils/src/linux-user/IBMgtSim/config/sha

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove typedef DAT_PROVIDER

2005-05-09 Thread James Lentini
Tom, If you are interested, there is one more thing you could look into/give me advice on: The dat module currently keeps track of its "state" (see the DAT_REGISTRY_STATE enumeration). The registry uses this information to detect the case when a provider or consumer calls a dat registry func

[openib-general] Re: A Couple of User CM Questions

2005-05-09 Thread Libor Michalek
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:22:17PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Libor, > > I have a couple of questions pertaining to the user CM. > > 1. It appears that device (and port) are not supported either incoming > or outgoing. So if that is correct, I presume only the first device > (first port) i

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove typedef DAT_PROVIDER

2005-05-09 Thread James Lentini
Definitely. On Mon, 9 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 14:06 -0400, James Lentini wrote: Committed revision 2287. On Fri, 6 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote: tduffy> James, thanks for applying my last patch. tduffy> tduffy> You know where I am going with this... this is the first in what w

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove typedef DAT_PROVIDER

2005-05-09 Thread Tom Duffy
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 14:06 -0400, James Lentini wrote: > Committed revision 2287. > > On Fri, 6 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote: > > tduffy> James, thanks for applying my last patch. > tduffy> > tduffy> You know where I am going with this... this is the first in what will > be > tduffy> a huge amoun

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][KDAPL] clean up code : evd flow

2005-05-09 Thread James Lentini
Since I only saw this error once, I decided to commit the patch (available in revision 2286). james On Mon, 9 May 2005, James Lentini wrote: Itamar, Could this patch have caused the error below? drivers/infiniband/ulp/dat-provider/dapl_evd_connection_callb.c:100: spin_lock(drivers/infiniband/ulp

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 1/2] mthca: max_inline_data support

2005-05-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 1/2] mthca: max_inline_data support > > Thanks... does it make sense to set the max_inline_data value for > kernel QPs but then not support posting inline data? That will come next (I plan to add that so ULPs can

[openib-general] A Couple of User CM Questions

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Libor, I have a couple of questions pertaining to the user CM. 1. It appears that device (and port) are not supported either incoming or outgoing. So if that is correct, I presume only the first device (first port) is the only one which can be expected to work. Correct ? If so, that should be

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] libibverbs/examples: fix parameter parsing

2005-05-09 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:29:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Fix for two obvious typos in pingpong and us-pingpong parameter parsing > (found by Grant in rdma_lat code). Actually found by Bernard Fischer in rdma_lat.c. Thanks for checking ibv_pingpong too. grant > > Signed-off-by: Mic

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][KDAPL] clean up code : evd flow

2005-05-09 Thread James Lentini
Itamar, Could this patch have caused the error below? drivers/infiniband/ulp/dat-provider/dapl_evd_connection_callb.c:100: spin_lock(drivers/infiniband/ulp/dat-provider/dapl_ep_util.c:d740a428) already locked by drivers/infiniband/ulp/dat-provider/dapl_evd_connection_callb.c/100 drivers/infiniba

[openib-general] Re: user-mode verbs on Itanium

2005-05-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Hello, Grant! Thanks for comments on the perftest. I think fixed all bug you found. I just did >svn mv https://openib.org/svn/trunk/contrib/mellanox/perftest >https://openib.org/svn/gen2/trunk/src/userspace Committed revision 2285. so we'll be able to exchange patches in the regular way. Quoti

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] libibverbs/examples: fix parameter parsing

2005-05-09 Thread Roland Dreier
Thanks, applied. ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 1/2] mthca: max_inline_data support

2005-05-09 Thread Roland Dreier
Thanks... does it make sense to set the max_inline_data value for kernel QPs but then not support posting inline data? Also should we add some error checking against the HCA's maximum WQE size? - R. ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib

Re: [kdapl] kdapltest -M flag (was RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] kDAPL: remove DAT_UINT32 and DAT_UINT64)

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 11:47, James Lentini wrote: > What is the exact command line you are using? > > This works for me > > ./kdapltest -T T -D mthca0a -s 192.168.0.6 -M PHY client SR 256 server SR 256 This was from before the fix was made for the default memory type but I don't think that woul

Re: [openib-general] user-mode verbs on Itanium

2005-05-09 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:49:16PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Besides the new flags, I noticed the following changes: > - asm/timex.h usage to get cycles. > Unfortunately not portable to all platforms: > on x86_64 asm/timex.h includes linux/config so its not legal > for userspace to i

[kdapl] kdapltest -M flag (was RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] kDAPL: remove DAT_UINT32 and DAT_UINT64)

2005-05-09 Thread James Lentini
What is the exact command line you are using? This works for me ./kdapltest -T T -D mthca0a -s 192.168.0.6 -M PHY client SR 256 server SR 256 On Mon, 9 May 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 10:29, James Lentini wrote: I also couldn't seem to get the -M PHY to work: DT_BpoolAlloc: da

Re: [openib-general] Re: kdapltest works again!, still having slab corruption

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 10:39, James Lentini wrote: > The slab corruption message below seems to involve IBAT's > req_comp_work function. Any ideas? I looked at this over the weekend and still don't have a working theory. req_comp_work calls req_free which based on the pend->type frees the (in this

[openib-general] Re: kdapltest works again!, still having slab corruption

2005-05-09 Thread James Lentini
Shahar, The slab corruption message below seems to involve IBAT's req_comp_work function. Any ideas? james On Sat, 7 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote: On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 01:54 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: Is the client connecting to a server which is present or not ? Yes, the client *is* connecting t

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] kDAPL: remove DAT_UINT32 and DAT_UINT64

2005-05-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 10:29, James Lentini wrote: > >>> I also couldn't seem to get the -M PHY to work: > >>> DT_BpoolAlloc: dat_lmr_kcreate failed DAT_SUCCESS DAT_INVALID_ARG7 > > > > Have you tried the -M option ? Do you see this ? > > What type of memory did you specify? -M PHY? -M PHY or -M V

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] kDAPL: remove DAT_UINT32 and DAT_UINT64

2005-05-09 Thread James Lentini
Let me know if you still have trouble. Works for me. Hope it does for Tom. I also couldn't seem to get the -M PHY to work: DT_BpoolAlloc: dat_lmr_kcreate failed DAT_SUCCESS DAT_INVALID_ARG7 Have you tried the -M option ? Do you see this ? What type of memory did you specify? -M PHY? __

[openib-general] [PATCH 2/2] libmthca: max_inline_data support

2005-05-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Userspace part of a patch: support max_inline_data capability. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: libmthca/src/qp.c === --- libmthca/src/qp.c (revision 2235) +++ libmthca/src/qp.c (working copy) @@ -718,

[openib-general] [PATCH 1/2] mthca: max_inline_data support

2005-05-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Kernel part of a patch: support max_inline_data capability in mthca. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: hw/mthca/mthca_dev.h === --- hw/mthca/mthca_dev.h(revision 2281) +++ hw/mthca/mthca_dev.h

[openib-general] Become one of the low rates

2005-05-09 Thread Tyler Ruiz
Hello, We tried contacting you awhile ago about your low interest morta(ge rate. You have qualified for the lowest rate in years... You could get over $380,000 for as little as $500 a month! Ba(d credit? Doesn't matter, low rates are fixed no matter what! To get a free, no obli,gation c