Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think you are referring to a Set of PortInfo which causes an event to
> IPoIB.
Yes.
> > There seems to be some bug related to local MAD handling:
>
> > if opensm is running on node A, and opensm is restarted,
> > all nodes will re-register in th
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:50:04PM -0400, Dhabaleswar Panda wrote:
> Hi Roland,
>
> > As for whether MPI should be in the OpenIB subversion tree or not, my
> > personal opinion is that having MPI there is only appropriate if the
> > svn tree is being used as the primary development source tree. I
Sean Hefty wrote:
I believe that the 220 byte payload length is for all RMPP MADs. Only the
common and RMPP header lengths are ignored.
Yes.
Doesn't it need to account for a "partial" rather than full last segment
transferred data in the first segment length ?
Yes I think it needs to us
Hi Hal,
Thanks for taking care of the RMPP issues.
Once you think both sender and receiver side issues are resolved please
let us know so I can re-run the test with the IB Analyzer.
Eitan
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi,
I will finish with RMPP and then embark on the 1.8.0 merge. I hope and
expect
